Hello,
On 02/19/2010 06:38 AM, Hemanshu Patel wrote:
Hello guys.
Recent now i had started taking keen interest in kamailio.
I was testing kamailio, and i had test it under two scenario.
first of all let me tell u about my configuration.
I am testing on normal Desktop pc, installed kamailio
Hello,
can you post the entire call flow, from initial invite to to the bye.
There is some mistake done somewhere in the routing elements. The sip
trace will help to identify where.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02/18/2010 12:48 AM, Vikram Ragukumar wrote:
Hello,
I also want to add that, this behavior
Hello guys.
Recent now i had started taking keen interest in kamailio.
I was testing kamailio, and i had test it under two scenario.
first of all let me tell u about my configuration.
I am testing on normal Desktop pc, installed kamailio,mysql, radius
everything on same pc.
I am using MYSQL
yes klaus
i know a command line option
say if i use -t l1 it creates only one connection for all reg messages but
if i use -t ln it will create (at least on documents) separate connection
for each and every REGISTER message.
I am using the latter one still getting 2 - 5 connection..
--
Reg
nice tip santi!
i thought you typed the callflow character per character.
Kelvin Chua
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Santiago Gimeno
wrote:
> Hi Iñaki,
>
> 2010/2/18 Iñaki Baz Castillo
>
> For now dialog module is not "forking-aware" which means that fails
>> detecting
>> cases like yours. H
Am 18.02.2010 11:14, schrieb Hemanshu Patel:
One more thing i notice is that kamailio currently support TLS over TCP only.
but even when i am firing register request at cps of say 300... it doesnt
show me 300 tcp connection. It shows just 2 - 5 tcp connection.
Can anyone give any explanation a
El Jueves, 18 de Febrero de 2010, Asterisk User escribió:
> Sorry for the trouble, but for the sake of simplicity I just removed
> those subsequent NOTIFY packets from my previous mail. Kamailio does
> keep on sending NOTIFY to the client but doesn't get OK.
ok, so no problem in kamailio's side.
Sorry for the trouble, but for the sake of simplicity I just removed
those subsequent NOTIFY packets from my previous mail. Kamailio does
keep on sending NOTIFY to the client but doesn't get OK.
You are right, phone is behind NAT. I just want to know if phone sends
OK to NOTIFY for the first time
Hi Iñaki,
2010/2/18 Iñaki Baz Castillo
For now dialog module is not "forking-aware" which means that fails
> detecting
> cases like yours. However I don't know which should be the expected
> behaviour
> for your case (serial forking) with the current dialog module code.
>
Thanks for the answer.
One more thing i notice is that kamailio currently support TLS over TCP only.
but even when i am firing register request at cps of say 300... it doesnt
show me 300 tcp connection. It shows just 2 - 5 tcp connection.
Can anyone give any explanation about the same?
--
Regards,
Hemanshu Patel
M
El Jueves, 18 de Febrero de 2010, Santiago Gimeno escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using kamailio 1.5 from the branch. In a conditional forwarding
> scenario with this call flow:
>
>
>Phone A KamailioPhone BPhone C
>
> |INVITE| |
El Jueves, 18 de Febrero de 2010, Asterisk User escribió:
> Please shed some light on this.
The problem is the following:
After the first re-SUBSCRIBE with "CSeq: 2002 SUBSCRIBE" it seems that the
client doesn't receive the 202 responses from the server, neither the NOTIFY.
Note that subsequent
You could try using kamailio 3.0 which has a reworked TLS implementation
which might work better.
Also, it may be that the problem is on SIPp side. I tested sipp with TLS
some years ago and it was not stable.
You could try with pjsip-perf - it should be rather easy to extend it to
TLS (http:
Hi,
I'm using kamailio 1.5 from the branch. In a conditional forwarding scenario
with this call flow:
Phone A KamailioPhone BPhone C
| | | |
| | | |
|
though it shows everything is working fine from sipp end...
my capacity with sipp+tls is around 20% to normal sipp.
i mean normal kamailio without tls.
ant kamailio log gives this error:
18 14:52:43 localhost ./sbin/kamailio[16989]: ERROR:core:tcp_read_req:
failed to read
Feb 18 14:52:43 local
i had created user certificate during process,which i set in kamailio
config file.
When i gave same certificate and private key to sipp...then it works..
but i am not sure if this is the right way.
Becaue i also for testing created another certificates signed by same
rootCA, and when imported t
Hello friendsm,
I am testing TLS feature of both kamailio and Sipp.
I first downloaded kamailio 1.5.x TLS supported version, uncommented TLS=1
from Makefiel and then build the kamailio.
first i test kamailio without TLS with sipp for registration and
everything works file.
Then i follow "http://
17 matches
Mail list logo
