[Kamailio-Users] Handling 3XX messages

2010-03-11 Thread Juha Heinanen
Bruno Machado writes: > And so on until this, the last contact: > > DBG:tm:t_next_contacts: next contact is ERROR:core:add_avp: 0 ID or NULL NAME AVP > ERROR:tm:t_next_contacts: setting of fr_inv_timer_avp failed > > The proxy sent INVITEs for all them, except the last one because this >

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Stateless failover

2010-03-11 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/3/11 Santiago Soares : > says I can't use forward(), for failover, I have to use t_relay, which > means that the server must be statefull. > But the thing is, i wouldn't like to maintain transactions state in > the server, due to the high memory usage. > Is it true? Can't I have failover suppo

[Kamailio-Users] Handling 3XX messages

2010-03-11 Thread Bruno Machado
Hi! I have a Kamailio 1.5.2 handling 3XX messages. The commands below are executed in a failure route. If the first contact is not reachable or even a negative answer is received, the algorithm will call a second failure route, executing the 't_next_contacts'. Following this logic, the server wil

[Kamailio-Users] Advanced Call Scenario / One Way Audio

2010-03-11 Thread Brandon Armstead
**resending as I am not sure if this made it out the first time, I do not believe it did, if this is a duplicate -- my apologies.** Hello, As always, thank you for all / any help and input you may provide in advance. Call Scenario: UA1 -> REGISTRAR-01 -> Kamailio-01 -> Asterisk (New Call-ID

Re: [Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/3/11 Henning Westerholt : > Hi Iñaki, > > this is of course better. Don't used it that much, for no particular reason, > so i usually don't thought about it. I use it in production. It's great as it loads the IP's or networks into memory (reloadable via MI command) :) It also returns a $rc

Re: [Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > you refer to allowing certain peers to bypass your authentification logic > > in the script and setting up calls? Sure, this is possible. Just add some > > logic that checks for a certain IP address and then route the call as you > > like. >

Re: [Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Uriel Rozenbaum
Joao, If you are going to use many hosts/subnets you can use permissions module. I use it to permit SIP traffic and to avoid auth. Rgds, Uriel On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Henning Westerholt < henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote: > On Thursday 11 March 2010, Joao Gomes Pereira wrote: > > Is

Re: [Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/3/11 Henning Westerholt : > On Thursday 11 March 2010, Joao Gomes Pereira wrote: >> Is is possible to implement IP authentication in Kamailio? >> Does Kamailio has a manual to do that? > > Hi Joao, > > you refer to allowing certain peers to bypass your authentification logic in > the script an

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Relaying NOTIFY UDP messages over TCP

2010-03-11 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2010/3/11 Pascal Maugeri : >> >> Does such NOTIFY go to a TCP registered user? Of course if there is >> not an existing TCP connection between Kamailio and the final natted >> user then it's not possible to send such NOTIFY. >> > > Do you mean that the user is sending "transport=tcp" in his Contact

Re: [Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 11 March 2010, Joao Gomes Pereira wrote: > Is is possible to implement IP authentication in Kamailio? > Does Kamailio has a manual to do that? Hi Joao, you refer to allowing certain peers to bypass your authentification logic in the script and setting up calls? Sure, this is possible

[Kamailio-Users] IP Authentication

2010-03-11 Thread Joao Gomes Pereira
Hello to all Is is possible to implement IP authentication in Kamailio? Does Kamailio has a manual to do that? Thanks regards Joao Pereira -- StarTel - A Rede Livre Joao Gomes Pereira www.startel.pt +351 304500650 sip: gomespere...@startel.pt ___ Kama

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Relaying NOTIFY UDP messages over TCP

2010-03-11 Thread Pascal Maugeri
> > > Does such NOTIFY go to a TCP registered user? Of course if there is > not an existing TCP connection between Kamailio and the final natted > user then it's not possible to send such NOTIFY. > > Do you mean that the user is sending "transport=tcp" in his Contact header ? > > > Is it acceptab

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Stateless failover

2010-03-11 Thread Santiago Soares
First of all, sorry for my bad english... :) This thread: http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-June/005012.html says I can't use forward(), for failover, I have to use t_relay, which means that the server must be statefull. But the thing is, i wouldn't like to maintain transactions stat

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Kamailio 3.0.0 Install Error

2010-03-11 Thread Nathaniel L Keeling
This is the GNU make from sunfreeware.com. Thanks Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Nathaniel L Keeling mailto:keel...@akan-tech.com>> wrote: I am trying to install the new release of Kamailio 3.0.0 on Solaris 10. When I perform the install, I a

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Stateless failover

2010-03-11 Thread Geoffrey Mina
I believe that is the default functionality of the Dispatcher module. I am not sure Dispatcher has anything to do with whether or not you are using the TM module... On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Santiago Soares wrote: > We're using Kamailio as a stateless load balancer, and would like to > add

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Kamailio 3.0.0 Install Error

2010-03-11 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Nathaniel L Keeling wrote: > I am trying to install the new release of Kamailio 3.0.0 on Solaris 10. > When I perform the install, I am getting this error. Here is the command > that I am entering for the install: > > make prefix=/usr/local/kamailio-3.0.0 I