On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 1/28/10 8:40 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights...
Is this kamailio 1.5 or kamailio 3.0 (looks like <3.0 to me)?
This is branches/1.5
With svn ve
some other answer below:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights...
On 1/28/10 2:41 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2010
elease(&c->write_lock);
May be still correct anyway...
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Aymeric
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Thursday 28 January 2010, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
here is the backtrace I have. unfortunatly without debug symbol!
I found the same for many of the kamailio process. "sched_yield"
is pending for ever. My system is a debian
ctly one thread each time.
I went through the lock/unlock of tcp_main.c but it seems every
lock has an unlock at least...
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Aymeric M
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 1/28/10 11:18 AM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
Got some more info:
The UDP deadlock always seems to happen after a SUBSCRIBE
is sent (in UDP) to mobipouce.com:
Jan 28 11:00:40 ns26829 /usr/sbin/kamailio[13363
formation
about the issue? Any kmctl command?
Regards,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
Hi again people!
I'm currently having some t
) that only UDP
support is broken: I can see some TLS and TCP registrations but
do not see the usual udp traffic (keep alive for example)
Any idea?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/
as I have several separate domains. Is there any
possibility to define alias for one specific domain?
sip.domain.com alias of domain.com
sip.domain2.com alias of domain2.com
etc...
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://
Hi again,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 23.11.2009 13:38 Uhr, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
I'm experimenting some modification in kamailio to
add support for a new "SIP event package". Unfortunalty,
it seems the parser of kamailio and its presence
Already, I got a patch:
http://sip.antisip.com/kamailio153-allow-any-event-package-v1.patch
very simple in fact, but yet not much tested!
Please post any remark as I'm not 100% sure about it...
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eX
9 because it is considered an EVENT_OTHER.
I'm working with 1.5.x branch. Would that be different in
newer core?
If I propose to write a patch, would you consider it?
What alternative do I have to add unknown event package
as module without modifying the core? Did I missed any
key?
Regards,
Aymer
are working nicely but the lifetime algo has some minor issue. That
would not affect anything if this value is kept higher than 120 seconds
anyway!
Tks for all,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip
I guess I found my issue:
*2009-07-13 12:40 Carsten Bock,
*
* * [r5899] timer.c:
* Fix double increase of jiffy-value.
* - As noticed by Daniel.
I'll update and see if it fixes all!
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 -
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
My linux is a standar ovh kernel "2.6.28.4--std-ipv4-32 #2 SMP". I
already got issue with the SIP NAT module statically linked into
the kernel that I couldn't rem
in the TCP handler).
Anyway, that does not answer the problems you are experiencing.
Right. But I'm getting closer!
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
regards
klaus
Klaus Dari
Do I have "tick" issue? Any idea?
I think I'm close to find either a bug or an issue with my kernel?
I got a timer running a route[] for statistics computation, in
case that would change something?
I'm using rtimer module: could this have an impact?
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
a
regards
klaus
Aymeric Moizard schrieb:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El Viernes, 23 de Octubre de 2009, Aymeric Moizard escribió:
Hi all,
I'm working on improving my TCP support and go some issue
related to TCP connections and lifetime/persistence.
Are you doing that in Kamailio's TM module?
Please
840
and 672 seconds.-
Tks for your help,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
___
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 06/28/2009 05:35 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
Hi,
I have an old openser13x which is used only to
control my sems voicemail and voice service.
I just checked with kamailio15x and
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
Hi,
I have an old openser13x which is used only to
control my sems voicemail and voice service.
I just checked with kamailio15x and the same error happens in mi_datagram.
tks
Aymeric
Some may know that speex payload format was published
as an
(send_msg)(531): SER answered: 400 parse error in
command
Jun 28 15:12:15 ns26829 Sems[30885]: Error:
(AmSession.cpp)(onInvite)(695): 500 could not send response
Question is: what's the best option for me to workaround
this!
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/6/5 Aymeric Moizard :
Hi Again, (sorry for wrong subject previous post),
I'm sure this is not enough to help, but I just got a crash using kamailio
1.5.
Jun 5 10:24:43 ns26829 /usr/sbin/kamailio[29050]:
CRITICAL:core:anchor_lump: o
829 /usr/sbin/kamailio[29036]: INFO:core:handle_sigs:
terminating due to SIGCHLD
What is that "offset exceeds message size"? What kind of trace should I take if
this happen again?
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.
io[29036]: INFO:core:handle_sigs:
terminating due to SIGCHLD
What is that "offset exceeds message size"? What kind of trace should I
take if this happen again?
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
O
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Freitag, 15. Mai 2009, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 05/13/2009 04:04 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/5/12 Aymeric Moizard :
Hi,
I got an issue with my kamailio 1.5 server. After
a long period, I start getting those message
nderstand is that I might fix my problem if I reduce
my "nonce_expires" value.
But: MAX_NONCE_INDEX=10
Do I really have reached this value: I don't think so. I
expect my setup would need around 1000 nonce. (registration,
calls and presence)
My conclusion is that there migh
ng DNS for SIP is not as fast(automatic) as for mail.
tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
___
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@li
cceptable for users... Want to guess my latest
patch for my product?
http://svn.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/trunk/exosip/src/eXutils.c?root=exosip&view=log#rev989
Just look at the last commit text:
"Add option to disable NAPTR requests"...
Regards,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip
; Internet the things that are deployable today always matter. (even if
> considered evil, such as NATs)
Don't be sorry.
My intention for this thread was just to ask ser/kamailio/whatever to
make sure the future will not be the same as the 10 past years. My
intention was not to say "you
the idea of non-replacing the "Contact" header
in the proxy (described in "outbound" proxy AFAIK).
UA can have correct contact even if not using outbound:
send OPTIONS
check received= and rport= parameter in answer.
send REGISTER with correct contact binding!
easy
Aym
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/1/4 Juha Heinanen :
Iñaki Baz Castillo writes:
> - Forcing RTP through a media proxy which involves SDP rewritting by
> the SIP proxy (so SDP cannot be encrypted).
forcing sip through proxies means that headers cannot be encrypted. i
fail
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Aymeric Moizard writes:
>
> > If you have a 100% working trick, I'll be interested to learn it! Very
> > interested!
>
> no, i don't have 100% working trick, but normal means cover 90+% of the
> cases. trying to av
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Aymeric Moizard writes:
>
> > * TURN is used ONLY when 2 peers cannot connect together, this means
> >that it's much better than always offering RTP relay which is
> >the solution today.
>
> kamailio tools
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/1/3 Aymeric Moizard :
This specification draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16 ios only about SIP:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-16
True, I didn't read it. Thanks.
You're welcome.
So for 100% of UA, STUN is
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2009/1/2 Aymeric Moizard :
I have used the ser_stun.c/.h files to add STUN support
on the socket of kamalio.
I have modified the XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS results because
wireshark is not analysing it the same way although I'm
not very sure who is
re to enable/disable
it.
Keep me informed,
tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamaili
e level or right below a m=
line.
This approach would solve such issue and would be much more
adequate to the requirement: currently it's not very possible
to relay an audio stream and not relay a video stream with the
current approach.
tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.c
Answer 4
Tks,
Aymeric MOIZARD / ANTISIP
amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> some people expressed inconveniences regarding the new
41 matches
Mail list logo
