-Users] carrier route vs LCR
On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
> > LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
> > selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
> > c
On Friday 10 April 2009, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that
> > LCR can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
> > selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
> > capability at all. but carrier route , according to LC
ontrol which route to pick up. there is no place to
>>> store the price,
>>> so how can we handle route based on price ?
>>>
>>> the only way I can think of is to create another temp table, store the route
>>> and price there,
>>> and then sel
another temp table, store the route
>> and price there,
>> and then select the lower priced ones and insert into carrierroute table. as
>> price changes,
>> we have to repeat this process again.
>>
>> is there any other better way ?
>>
>> Jimmy.
>>
d price there,
> and then select the lower priced ones and insert into carrierroute table. as
> price changes,
> we have to repeat this process again.
>
> is there any other better way ?
>
> Jimmy.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Ovidiu Sas"
&
Jinsong Hu writes:
> I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that LCR
> can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
> selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
> capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better than
> LCR.
009 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] carrier route vs LCR
> Both lcr and carrierroute can hadle routing based on price. It's just
> a matter of properly defining the routed.
> lcr is easier to approach then carrierroute. In 1.5 both of them are
> able to cope with large num
Both lcr and carrierroute can hadle routing based on price. It's just
a matter of properly defining the routed.
lcr is easier to approach then carrierroute. In 1.5 both of them are
able to cope with large number of routes.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jinsong Hu wrote:
>
I have been looking at the carrier route and LCR. it appears to me that LCR
can be used to handle tariff , i.e,
selecting lowest cost route. while carrier route doesn't have this
capability at all. but carrier route , according to LCR, scales better than
LCR.
for a typical telco, the rate sheet
