On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Omar wrote:
> Hello
>
> I did the same Changes long time ago, but i have the same issue even
> when always goes more to one IP, and we really know when will go to
> the Next IP also is there a way if the endpoint is down will the calls
> go to the next IP automatically
Hello
I did the same Changes long time ago, but i have the same issue even
when always goes more to one IP, and we really know when will go to
the Next IP also is there a way if the endpoint is down will the calls
go to the next IP automatically?
i have the same table scenario with .5 and
Dear Uriel,
I found it...The problem was in the makefile of carrierroute module...I did
Chged the following:
DEFS+=$(CONFUSEDEFS)
LIBS=$(CONFUSELIBS)
TO:
DEFS+=-I$(LOCALBASE)/include
LIBS=-L$(LOCALBASE)/lib -lconfuse
It seems that carrierroute needs that in order to be compiled on Solaris
Th
Dear Uriel,
It worked fine as you mentionned below and Y.Y.Y.Y is used when I changed
the domain to 1 on X.X.X.X
Regards
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Uriel Rozenbaum
wrote:
> It's really weird. Try changing the domain on the X.X.X.X host to 1, so you
> only have Y.Y.Y.Y host available as fi
It's really weird. Try changing the domain on the X.X.X.X host to 1, so you
only have Y.Y.Y.Y host available as first option.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:07 PM, michel freiha wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I did 2 calls from the same endpoint to the same number and get 2 different
> IDs but still forwardi
Dear Sir,
I did 2 calls from the same endpoint to the same number and get 2 different
IDs but still forwarding the calls to X.X.X.X as follow:
Call1:
call-id for this call 56549e09d94c1430Jul 30 17:00:32 [10607]
DBG:carrierroute:get_route_tree_by_id: searching in carrier default, id 5
Jul 30 17:
The random value is based on the Call-ID, use debug=4 and add an XLOG as
follows before every call to cr_route:
xlog("L_ERR", "call-id for this call $ci");
Check the call-id is different every time and the CRC32 algorithm to
calculate the hash values gives a different answer.
On Thu, Jul 30, 200
When restarting kamailio I found out that it reads both routes
Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor: hashless rule
with host Y.Y.Y.Y hash hash_index 1
Jul 30 11:46:40 [9165] INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor: hashless rule
with host X.X.X.X hash hash_index 2
I jjst do
Dear Sir,
Please find below carrierroute table...
++-++-+---+--+--+---+--+++-+
| id | carrier | domain | scan_prefix | flags | mask | prob | strip |
rewrite_host | rewrite_prefix | rewrite_suffi
I'm really not sure how it works when you use a 0 prob.
Try something like 50/50 and check if the requests go to both servers.
Also, some extract from /var/log/messages will help.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:38 AM, michel freiha wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> My tables are defined as below:
>
> *carrier
Dear Sir,
My tables are defined as below:
*carrierroute table:*
id carrier domain scan_prefix flags maskprob
striprewrite_host
19 5 1 00 0
0 0 0 IP_address1
19 5 1
Does both entries belong to the same carrier? You can try to set both entries
with the same carrier id in the carrier column and the same domain.
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:39:02 +0300
From: mich...@gmail.com
To: users@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: [Kamailio-Users] Carrierroute issue
Hi all
Michel,
The prob field is to set the proportion of a certain entry to be taken when
you are load balancing between carriers.
To perform an overflow operation you have to use the domain field.
Check the samples on the module documentation; it's preety clear there; if
you have further questions ju
Hi all,
I'm using carrierroute module and ie seems that it's not working
well...Suppose I have 2 entries in carrierroute table...Entry 1 with scan
prefix 00 and prob 0 and a second entry with scan prefix 00 and prob=1...As
soon as i make a call, this call will be forwarded to the entry with prob 0
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009, Omar Mendoza wrote:
> Everything works fine except the strip Nor the rewrite_prefix removes
> anything from the record route(not sure if it should do it) nor from
> the To: Header and the to header IP address remain keeps the Kamailio
> ip address.
Hi Omar,
this is the
Everything works fine except the strip Nor the rewrite_prefix removes
anything from the record route(not sure if it should do it) nor from
the To: Header and the to header IP address remain keeps the Kamailio
ip address.
then many providers request the To: need to math the RURI invite.
ple
I have a prefix, and i remove using the Strip in the DB
INVITE sip:8135553...@192.168.2.77 SIP/2.0
Record-Route:
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.168.1.170;branch=z9hG4bKa5b6.ce53.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 198.168.1.180:5060;branch=z9hG4bK292133e9;rport=5060
From: "Omar" ;tag=as1074edd2
To:
Contact:
Stagg Shelton writes:
> Can carrierroute and LCR be used together? If so can you give me a
> few pointers so that I can get a lab system working. If not can you
> suggest whether or not carrierroute could or should be used to route
> based on rate center. The rate center list from my
On Tuesday 14 April 2009, Stagg Shelton wrote:
> I am preparing to add a new upstream SIP provider to my network, and
> now have a requirement to route based on the number that the user is
> calling. From what I have read it appears that LCR is the better
> method for doing this.
Hi Stagg,
lcr i
I am preparing to add a new upstream SIP provider to my network, and
now have a requirement to route based on the number that the user is
calling. From what I have read it appears that LCR is the better
method for doing this. I have one small issue in that I have a few
customers who switc
Yes, that is correct. And it is mentioned in the docs.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Asim Riaz wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>>
>> Have you set:
>> modparam("carrierroute", "match_mode", 128)
>
> Hi Ovidiu,
> match_mode is supported in
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Have you set:
> modparam("carrierroute", "match_mode", 128)
Hi Ovidiu,
match_mode is supported in 1.5, so its means only digits can be matched in
1.4 ?
i am running kamailio 1.4 ;
ERROR:core:set_mod_param_regex: parameter not found in module
Have you set:
modparam("carrierroute", "match_mode", 128)
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Asim Riaz wrote:
> Hi Ovidiu,
> yes i have gone through the module doc, its works fine if the scan_prefix
> is not starting from *, e.g no problem if the scane_prefix is 222 but if I
Hi Ovidiu,
yes i have gone through the module doc, its works fine if the scan_prefix
is not starting from *, e.g no problem if the scane_prefix is 222 but if I
use *222* as scane_prefix, Kamailio does not run. I am running Kamailio 1.4.
Thanks,
Asim
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Ovidiu Sas
Have you checked the documentation?
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/1.5.x/carrierroute.html#id2467664
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
2009/3/26 Asim Riaz :
> Hi List,
> is it possible to add a scan_prefix like *222* in carrierroute? if i add a
> prefix like this in DB(carrierroute), I dont get any erro
Hi List,
is it possible to add a scan_prefix like *222* in carrierroute? if i add a
prefix like this in DB(carrierroute), I dont get any error but Kamailio
does not run.
any idea why?
Thanks,
Asim
___
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users@lis
Thanks a lot Henning...The issue has been solved...You were right
Regards
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Henning Westerholt <
henning.westerh...@1und1.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 24 January 2009, michel freiha wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > i tried to use the below function:
> >
> > if (!cr_route("
On Saturday 24 January 2009, michel freiha wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> i tried to use the below function:
>
> if (!cr_route("$avp(s:carrier)", "$avp(s:domain)", "$rU", "$rU","call_id",
> "$avp(s:host)")) {
>
> during restart I did not get any error...When trying to make a call i got
> the following erro
Dear Sir,
i tried to use the below function:
if (!cr_route("$avp(s:carrier)", "$avp(s:domain)", "$rU", "$rU","call_id",
"$avp(s:host)")) {
during restart I did not get any error...When trying to make a call i got
the following error:
Jan 24 11:41:36 [12948] ERROR:tm:t_newtran: transaction alrea
Hi all,
I have a problem with carrierroute module...I have configured it as follow
in my config file:
loadmodule "carrierroute.so"
##Carrier Route
modparam("carrierroute", "db_url", "mysql://opensips:123...@mysql_ip
/opensips")
modparam("carrierroute", "config_source", "db")
In the route fun
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
> I did use
> if($rU =~ "^[+].*")
> {
>
> strip(1);
>
> }
>
> before the cr statement ...from asterisk I get address incomplete at
> times..when this happens I find that the first two characters are
ciano Afranllie [mailto:listas.luaf...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 2009-01-23 17:20
> To: Ali Jawad
> Cc: Henning Westerholt; users@lists.kamailio.org
> Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] CarrierRoute With + Prefix
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Ali Jawad
> wrote:
>>
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] CarrierRoute With + Prefix
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Ali Jawad
wrote:
> Hi Again
>
> I did use
>if($rU =~ "^[+].*")
>{
>
>strip(1);
>
>}
>
> before the
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi Again
>
> I did use
>if($rU =~ "^[+].*")
>{
>
>strip(1);
>
>}
>
> before the cr statement ...from asterisk I get address incomplete at
> times..when this happens I find that the first two
one.
Any clues ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Henning Westerholt [mailto:henning.westerh...@1und1.de]
Sent: 2009-01-23 17:04
To: Ali Jawad
Cc: users@lists.kamailio.org
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] CarrierRoute With + Prefix
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi
>
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi
> THanks for that update. Is there a way to automatically set the
> probality of one to the servers to 0, if it is down returning failed
> calls ?
> Thanks
No, functionality like this is provided from the dispatcher module. If you
want to implement
: Ali Jawad
Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] CarrierRoute With + Prefix
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
> I was able to setup carrierroute in database mode and when I make a
> call with prefix 00 it works fine. For that I did setup an entry in
> carrierroute, I did duplicate
On Friday 23 January 2009, Ali Jawad wrote:
> I was able to setup carrierroute in database mode and when I make a call
> with prefix 00 it works fine. For that I did setup an entry in
> carrierroute, I did duplicate that same entry for prefix "+".
> If I call 004353453 it works fine however if I di
Hi All
I was able to setup carrierroute in database mode and when I make a call
with prefix 00 it works fine. For that I did setup an entry in
carrierroute, I did duplicate that same entry for prefix "+".
If I call 004353453 it works fine however if I dial +12341234 I get a
403 forbidden error. The
On Tuesday 30 December 2008, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> I can conform that the rewrite_host can be reliable read from $rd.
> Thank you for looking into this.
Hi Ovidiu,
i just commited the change, should be work now.
Cheers,
Henning
___
K
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
> Hi Henning and list, here is a description of the configuration that Im
> trying to test with carrierroute:
>
> I have 4 groups of customers calling to 6 different destinations. Each
> customerGroup has specific rules about the destinations that
Hi Henning and list, here is a description of the configuration that Im
trying to test with carrierroute:
I have 4 groups of customers calling to 6 different destinations. Each
customerGroup has specific rules about the destinations that are allowed
to call.
For ex.
CustomerGroup 1 can call to S-
On Monday 19 January 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
> Is it possible to choose different domains using the parameter
> "scan_prefix" on the "carrierroute" table?
>
> For example: 1 have one carrier with two different domains pointing each
> one of them to a different host.
>
> If the user makes a call t
Hi Henning,
Is it possible to choose different domains using the parameter
"scan_prefix" on the "carrierroute" table?
For example: 1 have one carrier with two different domains pointing each
one of them to a different host.
If the user makes a call to a number starting with 234 the call goes to
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
> > you don't need to combine all carriers together. If you want to priorize
> > over different carriers, then i'd suggest you also use them in cr. For
> > example something like this:
> >
> > - carrier premium; domain 0, 1, 2; GWs a1, a2, a3, b1, b
Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
>
>> I found this in a post that I include at the end of this message, but
>> the part that I want to ask about is this one:
>>
>> "You can put all the carriers under the same table and prioritize the
>> gateway based
On Wednesday 07 January 2009, Juan Asencio wrote:
> I found this in a post that I include at the end of this message, but
> the part that I want to ask about is this one:
>
> "You can put all the carriers under the same table and prioritize the
> gateway based on domains. Like tis you don't need t
Hi list, I'm reading some old post in order to implement carrierroute.
I found this in a post that I include at the end of this message, but
the part that I want to ask about is this one:
"You can put all the carriers under the same table and prioritize the
gateway based on domains. Like tis yo
Hello Henning,
I can conform that the rewrite_host can be reliable read from $rd.
Thank you for looking into this.
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:08 AM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Mon, December 29, 2008 4:47 pm, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> Hello Henning,
>>
>> Can we change the name
On Mon, December 29, 2008 4:47 pm, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> Can we change the name of the avp and retrieve the content of the
> "descritpion" field in it?
Hi Ovidiu,
if the rewrite_host can be also reliable read from some PVs, then this
should be possible. Let me do some tests first
Hello Henning,
Can we change the name of the avp and retrieve the content of the
"descritpion" field in it?
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Henning Westerholt
wrote:
> On Fri, December 19, 2008 2:58 pm, rod wrote:
>> I'd like to know if there is a way to retrieve the inform
Henning,
For the rewrite host I was looking for, I got it using $rd pseudovariable.
Thanks for your support,
Regards,
rod
Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Fri, December 19, 2008 2:58 pm, rod wrote:
>
>> I'd like to know if there is a way to retrieve the information from the
>> carrierroute modu
On Fri, December 19, 2008 2:58 pm, rod wrote:
> I'd like to know if there is a way to retrieve the information from the
> carrierroute module in AVPs.
> Example:
> - a prefix has matched, and I'd like to get the field "description"
> associated with this route and add it in the SIP header
>
Hi,
I'd like to know if there is a way to retrieve the information from the
carrierroute module in AVPs.
Example:
- a prefix has matched, and I'd like to get the field "description"
associated with this route and add it in the SIP header
- a prefix has matched, and I'd like to get t
Hi all,
i'm happy to announce that we finished the work on the carrierroute module for
kamailio 1.5. We implemented a bunch of new features that makes the module
more flexible then ever, and also fixed a few annoyances in the module usage:
1. Improved routing data loading
The module supports n
On Friday 03 October 2008, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> > I want to use carrierroute to terminate 50,000 preffixes to a PSTN gw
> > and block 100,000.
> > So I created 50,000 records with gw ip as rewrite_host. However I only
> > was able to start kamailio with no more than about 2,200 records
Hello,
Pablo Bertuzzi wrote:
> Hi Forum,
>
> I want to use carrierroute to terminate 50,000 preffixes to a PSTN gw
> and block 100,000.
> So I created 50,000 records with gw ip as rewrite_host. However I only
> was able to start kamailio with no more than about 2,200 records in
> carrierroute m
Hi Forum,
I want to use carrierroute to terminate 50,000 preffixes to a PSTN gw and block
100,000.
So I created 50,000 records with gw ip as rewrite_host. However I only was able
to start kamailio with no more than about 2,200 records in carrierroute mysql
table.
Is it possible to use carrierr
That fixed it thanks
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 4:03 PM, TCB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you need libconfuse-deve !
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Mouncif Benniane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> I did install libconfuse rpm for centos 5 but still same compile results
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] s
you need to install the devel version of the library.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/07/08 22:38, Mouncif Benniane wrote:
> I did install libconfuse rpm for centos 5 but still same compile results
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sip-server]# rpm -qa | grep confuse
> *libconfuse-2.5-4.el5*
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sip-se
I did install libconfuse rpm for centos 5 but still same compile results
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip-server]# rpm -qa | grep confuse
*libconfuse-2.5-4.el5*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sip-server]#
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> You need libconfuse, don't kno
You need libconfuse, don't know exactly the name of the package on centos.
http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/1.3.x/carrierroute.html#AEN53
Cheers,
Daniel
PS. Please note that the new mailing list address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 08/07/08 22:25, Mouncif Benniane wrote:
> I am compiling versio
I am compiling version openser 1.3.2 on centos realease 5
getting compile error stooping at carrierroute module see below:
make[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/local/src/openser-1.3.2/sip-server/modules/carrierroute'
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src/openser-1.3.2/sip-server/modules/carrie
63 matches
Mail list logo
