Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-08 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Klaus, On 1/7/10 6:35 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Daniel, isn't the configuration somehow compiled into internal format? Would it be possible to do the "compilation" on another server and provide only a binary file which represents the internal structure of the configuration? indeed inside i

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Alex Balashov wrote: > > Daniel, isn't the configuration somehow compiled into internal format? > > Would it be possible to do the "compilation" on another server and > > provide only a binary file which represents the internal structure of > > the configuration? > > I

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Alex Balashov
On 01/07/2010 12:35 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Daniel, isn't the configuration somehow compiled into internal format? Would it be possible to do the "compilation" on another server and provide only a binary file which represents the internal structure of the configuration? It just uses a lexer.

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Klaus Darilion
Daniel, isn't the configuration somehow compiled into internal format? Would it be possible to do the "compilation" on another server and provide only a binary file which represents the internal structure of the configuration? regards klaus Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb: On 1/7/10 4:40

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Olle E. Johansson
7 jan 2010 kl. 18.12 skrev Alex Balashov: > I think it'd be neat if Kamailio could optionally read its config from stdin, > though obviously that would cause certain things like "includes" to not > necessarily work. Then Kamailio could be provisioned from a central server > potentially, e.g.

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Alex Balashov
I think it'd be neat if Kamailio could optionally read its config from stdin, though obviously that would cause certain things like "includes" to not necessarily work. Then Kamailio could be provisioned from a central server potentially, e.g. wget | kamailio. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evar

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Thursday 07 January 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Does not inherently, but you could concoct it yourself. > > indeed, for that is good to know that the config file is not needed > during run-time, so once kamailio is started, you can delete the plain > text config and keep encrypted

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Schumann Sebastian
nal Message- > From: users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > Sent: Thursday, 07. January 2010 17:19 > To: users@lists.kamailio.org > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script > > &

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 1/7/10 4:40 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Does not inherently, but you could concoct it yourself. indeed, for that is good to know that the config file is not needed during run-time, so once kamailio is started, you can delete the plain text config and keep encrypted version (e.g., gpg). Ch

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Unreadable script

2010-01-07 Thread Alex Balashov
Does not inherently, but you could concoct it yourself. On 01/07/2010 10:06 AM, Bruno Machado wrote: Hi all I'm using the version 1.5.2 and I'd like to know from you if it is possible to 'hide' the config file. Using other words, becoming the file unreadable for us, humans. There are people th