But who is the best between the
intercommunicator and intracommunicator?
Is better use an
intercommunicator with Send/Recv or Bcast...
or is better use the
MPI_Intercomm_merge and to use the Send/Recv or Bcast inside the new
intracommunicator created?
I talk about the performance...is more
faste
I have a simple question for you...
But who is the best between the
intercommunicator and intracommunicator?
Is better use an
intercommunicator with Send/Recv or Bcast...
or is better use the
MPI_Intercomm_merge and to use the Send/Recv or Bcast inside the new
intracommunicator created?
I ta
I think the answer to all your questions is: "it depends on your
application."
MPI is used on extremely large clusters (many thousands of nodes), but with
applications that were specially written for those large numbers of nodes.
You need to look at the specific requirements of your application (G
On Sep 15, 2006, at 10:36 AM, imran shaik wrote:
Can you elaborate on this.?
I have few doubts as well:
1) OpenMPI runtime supports SGE?? Does it uses SGE instead of MPI
runtime when it finds SGE running??
It's a difficult question if you expect an answer describing the deep
internals of
Ok, thanks for the info Renato.
Have a nice week end.
Imran
Renato Golin wrote: On 9/15/06, imran shaik wrote:
> Where can i get MPI::Simple??
$ cpan
cpan> install Parallel::MPI::Simple
you can try other MPI implementations but I guess mpich is the only
one that will work...
cheers,
--
Thanks prakash.
Cheers,
Imran
Prakash Velayutham wrote: AFAIK, both those
modules work with MPI standard API and not others. The
MPI::Simple I mentioned is actually Parallel::MPI::Simple. Both
Parallel::MPI and Parallel::MPI::Simple are available from CPAN.
Prakash
imran shaik wrote:
>
On 9/15/06, imran shaik wrote:
Where can i get MPI::Simple??
$ cpan
cpan> install Parallel::MPI::Simple
you can try other MPI implementations but I guess mpich is the only
one that will work...
cheers,
--renato
AFAIK, both those modules work with MPI standard API and not others. The
MPI::Simple I mentioned is actually Parallel::MPI::Simple. Both
Parallel::MPI and Parallel::MPI::Simple are available from CPAN.
Prakash
imran shaik wrote:
> Hi Prakash,
> Do i need MPI runtime environment for sure to ue t
Hi folks,
Is MPI suitable for running jobs on large clusters??
Is it best suited only for SMP ?
I used MPI on relatively small cluster.
But now i have to recommend MPI for a relatively large 600 node cluster.
Shall I ??
The nature of jobs is well, processing tera bytes of data.
Th
Hi Prakash,
Do i need MPI runtime environment for sure to ue those perl modules??
Cant i use some other clustring software.?
Where can i get MPI::Simple??
Imran
>Hello,
>My users use Parallel::MPI and MPI::Simple perl modules consistently
>without issues. But I am not sure of the
On 9/15/06 10:36 AM, "imran shaik" wrote:
> Hi Renato,
> thanks for your response.
> Can you elaborate on this.?
> I have few doubts as well:
> 1) OpenMPI runtime supports SGE?? Does it uses SGE instead of MPI runtime
> when it finds SGE running??
SGE support will be included in Open MP
Hi Renato,
thanks for your response.
Can you elaborate on this.?
I have few doubts as well:
1) OpenMPI runtime supports SGE?? Does it uses SGE instead of MPI runtime
when it finds SGE running??
2) Is it possible to check point and run MPI jobs?
3) Is it possible to add and remove pro
Hi renato,
thanks man!
That was the detailed explanation.
I got teh perl module too...
Imran
Renato Golin wrote: On 9/13/06, imran shaik wrote:
> I need to run parallel jobs on a cluster typically of size 600 nodes and
> running SGE, but the programmers are good at perl but not C or C
Brian Barrett wrote:
On Jul 5, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Marcin Skoczylas wrote:
I saw some posts ago almost the same question as I have, but it didn't
give me satisfactional answer.
I have setup like this:
GUI program on some machine (f.e. laptop)
Head listening on tcpip socket for commands from G
14 matches
Mail list logo