(brought over from the OMPI user's list)
This likely means you installed hwloc to a non-standard location (meaning that
your system is not looking for shared libraries in $hwloc_prefix/lib by
default).
If you prepend/append your LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable (or set it, if
it's not
This should be addressed on the hwloc-users list; I'll reply over there.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 12:51 PM, vaibhav dutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed HWLOC 1.2 on my cluster , each node has two Intel Xeon E5450
> quad cores.
> When I try to execute the command "lstopo" to determine the
Hi,
I have installed HWLOC 1.2 on my cluster , each node has two Intel Xeon
E5450 quad cores.
When I try to execute the command "lstopo" to determine the hardware
topology of my system,
I get an error like:
./lstopo: error while loading shared libraries: libhwloc.so.3: cannot open
shared object
Hello,
I'm currently trying to build OpenMPI v. 1.4.3 from source, in VS2008.
Platform is Win7, SP1 installed ( I realize that this is possibly not an ideal
approach as v. 1.5.3 has installers for Windows binaries. However for
compatibility with other programs I need to use v. 1.4.3 if at
On 6/7/2011 10:23 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:00 , Edgar Gabriel wrote:
>
>> George,
>>
>> I did not look over all the details of your test, but it looks to
>> me like you are violating one of the requirements of
>> intercomm_create namely the request that the two
On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:00 , Edgar Gabriel wrote:
> George,
>
> I did not look over all the details of your test, but it looks to me
> like you are violating one of the requirements of intercomm_create
> namely the request that the two groups have to be disjoint. In your case
> the parent
George,
I did not look over all the details of your test, but it looks to me
like you are violating one of the requirements of intercomm_create
namely the request that the two groups have to be disjoint. In your case
the parent process(es) are part of both local intra-communicators, isn't it?
I
On Jun 7, 2011, at 4:53 AM, Troels Haugboelle wrote:
> In principle yes, but the problem is we have an unequal amount of particles
> on each node, so the length of each array is not guaranteed to be divisible
> by 2, 4 or any other number. If I have understood the definition of
>
George --
Do we need to file a bug about this?
On Jun 7, 2011, at 1:57 AM, George Bosilca wrote:
> Frederic,
>
> Attached you will find an example that is supposed to work. The main
> difference with your code is on T3, T4 where you have inversed the local and
> remote comm. As depicted on
Thanks for your reply
In fact as you said it was a strange problem with the .bashrc
with sudo make install I have the error, but with sudo bash and then
make install the error disappears.
I did'nt understand why
Everything seems OK now, no more problem at runtime.
Thanks
2011/6/7 Jeff
Frederic,
Attached you will find an example that is supposed to work. The main difference
with your code is on T3, T4 where you have inversed the local and remote comm.
As depicted on the picture attached below, during the 3th step you will create
the intercomm between ab and c (no overlap)
11 matches
Mail list logo