Re: [OMPI users] Seg fault in MPI_FINALIZE

2015-10-22 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
1.10.1 isn't released yet -- it's "very close" (just working on a few final issues), but not quite out the door yet. Stay tuned... > On Oct 22, 2015, at 2:26 PM, McGrattan, Kevin B. Dr. > wrote: > > OK, I guess I have to upgrade to 1.10.x. I think we have 1.10.0 and I’ll ask > for the lates

Re: [OMPI users] Seg fault in MPI_FINALIZE

2015-10-22 Thread McGrattan, Kevin B. Dr.
OK, I guess I have to upgrade to 1.10.x. I think we have 1.10.0 and I'll ask for the latest. Already using the Intel Fortran 16. Hope it helps. Thanks Kevin McGrattan National Institute of Standards and Technology 100 Bureau Drive, Mail Stop 8664 Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899

Re: [OMPI users] Questions about non-blocking collective calls...

2015-10-22 Thread Eric Chamberland
Hi Gilles and Josh, I think my reply apply to both of your answers which I thank you for. On 21/10/15 08:31 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote: Eric, #2 maybe not ... a tree based approach has O(log(n)) scaling (compared to O(n) scaling with your linear method. so at scale, MPI_Igather will hopeful

Re: [OMPI users] Questions about non-blocking collective calls...

2015-10-22 Thread Joshua Ladd
Instead of posting a single, big MPI_Igather, why not post and simultaneously progress multiple, small MPI_Igathers? In this way, you can pipeline multiple outstanding collectives and do post collective processing as soon as requests complete. Without network hardware offload capability, Gilles' ob