On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:28:33AM -0700, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> The deadlock happens with or without your patch ? If it's with your
> patch, the problem might come from the fact that you start 2
> processes on each node and you will share the port range (because of
> your patch).
If pro
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:40:36PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 2:24 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
>
> > 1. I don't believe the OS to release the binding when we close the
> > socket. As an example on Linux the kernel sockets are release at a
> > later moment. That means the so
Thanks for all your replies and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:40:21PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Chris Reeves wrote:
>
> > Also attached is a small patch that I wrote to work around some firewall
> >
(This time with attachments...)
Hi there,
I've had a look through the FAQ and searched the list archives and can't find
any similar problems to this one.
I'm running OpenMPI 1.2.2 on 10 Intel iMacs (Intel Core2 Duo CPU). I am
specifiying two slots per machine and starting my job with:
/Network/
Hi there,
I've had a look through the FAQ and searched the list archives and can't find
any similar problems to this one.
I'm running OpenMPI 1.2.2 on 10 Intel iMacs (Intel Core2 Duo CPU). I am
specifiying two slots per machine and starting my job with:
/Network/Guanine/csr201/local-i386/opt/ope
