questions / discussion where you need someone from
our side to answer comments, let me know and I can join the discussion
on the OSI list.
On May 21, 2025, at 7:06 PM, McCoy Smith
wrote:
FWIW if there is any objection to me doing this from Open MPI, let me
know as I'd want to let OSI know
ly be contacted with questions, but I am most definitely
not a lawyer.
Per the 2nd and 3rd messages on that thread, do you need me to join
that list? If so, I’d probably join it for limited time (i.e., just
for the duration of that discussion).
On May 21, 2025, at 5:17 PM, McCoy Smith
wrote:
J
questions, but I am most definitely
not a lawyer.
Per the 2nd and 3rd messages on that thread, do you need me to join
that list? If so, I’d probably join it for limited time (i.e., just
for the duration of that discussion).
On May 21, 2025, at 5:17 PM, McCoy Smith
wrote:
Just a note to t
d that Open MPI is the steward of this license (which I believe
it to be); I'm not sure if anyone on this list continues to steward the
license (which is over 20 years old, AFAIK), but if you have opinions on
this submission, you may want to provide them to the OSI mailing list.
McCoy Smith
