Re: [OMPI users] Best MPI implementation

2006-03-27 Thread Michael Kluskens
On Mar 27, 2006, at 4:11 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: For your code, most MPI implementations (Open MPI, LAM/MPI, etc.) support the same API. So if it compiles/links with one, it *should* compile/link with the others (assuming you coded it in an MPI- conformant way). The MPI installe

Re: [OMPI users] Best MPI implementation

2006-03-27 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams
Howdy all, This is kind of an oddball think to ask, but does anyone have a rhel_4_ia64 box they'd be will to let me finnish debugging mpich-1.2.7p1? There's a memory corruption bug that shows up for mpich-1.2.6 and -1.2.7p1, but only for the rhel_4_ia64, and I'd decided it was probably the comm p

Re: [OMPI users] Best MPI implementation

2006-03-27 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
06 5:45 AM > To: us...@open-mpi.org > Subject: [OMPI users] Best MPI implementation > > Hi! > I am going to start my approach to parallel programming (on C or C++) > and I would like to know what should I learn/use, LAM MPI, OpenMPI, or > any other MPI implementation. > Can an

[OMPI users] Best MPI implementation

2006-03-27 Thread Tony Power
Hi! I am going to start my approach to parallel programming (on C or C++) and I would like to know what should I learn/use, LAM MPI, OpenMPI, or any other MPI implementation. Can anyone advise me please? I believe OpenMPI would be best, but I can't find any tutorial on OpenMPI. Thank you very much