Re: [OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE designation ...

2010-08-17 Thread Richard Walsh
quot; in states.F90. Thanks, Yong Qin > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:55:47 -0400 > From: Richard Walsh > Subject: [OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE >designation ... > To: Open MPI Users > Message-ID: ><5e9838fe224683

Re: [OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE designation ...

2010-08-17 Thread Yong Qin
2010 18:55:47 -0400 > From: Richard Walsh > Subject: [OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE >        designation ... > To: Open MPI Users > Message-ID: >        <5e9838fe224683419f586d9df46a0e25b049898...@mbox.flas.csi.cuny.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; ch

Re: [OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE designation ...

2010-08-16 Thread Jeff Squyres
MPI_IN_PLACE is defined in both mpif.h and the "mpi" Fortran module. Does the subroutine in question have "include mpif.h" or "use mpi"? On Aug 16, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Richard Walsh wrote: > > All, > > I have a fortran code (Octopus 3.2) that is bombing during a build in a > routine that uses:

[OMPI users] Does OpenMPI 1.4.1 support the MPI_IN_PLACE designation ...

2010-08-16 Thread Richard Walsh
All, I have a fortran code (Octopus 3.2) that is bombing during a build in a routine that uses: call MPI_Allreduce(MPI_IN_PLACE, rho(1, ispin), np, MPI_DOUBLE_PRECISION, MPI_SUM, st%mpi_grp%comm, mpi_err) with the error message: states.F90(1240): error #6404: This name does not have a type,