Hi Ralph,
thanks a lot, including it in the next release would be great.
Best regards
Igor
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:30:25 -0700
Ralph Castain wrote:
> Hi Igor
>
> As I recall, this eventually traced back to a change in slurm at some point.
> I believe the latest interpretation is in line with
Hi Igor
As I recall, this eventually traced back to a change in slurm at some point. I
believe the latest interpretation is in line with your suggestion. I believe we
didn't change it because nobody seemed to care very much, but I have no
objection to including it in the next release.
Thanks
r
Dear all,
there's been some discussions about this already, but the issue is still there
(in 1.4.4). When running SLURM jobs with the --cpus-per-task parameter set
(e.g. when running Open MPI-OpenMP jobs, so that --cpus-per-tasks corresponds
to the number of OpenMP threads per rank), you get th