o output) when
> I specified btl_base_verbose 100.
> >
> > I will try using the CIDR for the below hosts as an experiment.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vipul
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Tues
gt; Vipul
>
>
>
> From: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) [mailto:jsquy...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 1:36 PM
> To: Open MPI User's List
> Cc: Kulshrestha, Vipul
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Question about virtual interface
>
> https://www.open-mpi.
Vipul
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Question about virtual interface
https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tcp#ip-virtual-ip-interfaces is
referring to interfaces like "eth0:0", where the Linux kernel will have the
same index for both "eth0" and "eth0:0". This will cause
https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tcp#ip-virtual-ip-interfaces is
referring to interfaces like "eth0:0", where the Linux kernel will have the
same index for both "eth0" and "eth0:0". This will cause Open MPI to get
confused (because it identifies Ethernet interfaces by their kernel indexes
Hi,
I have read conflicting statements about OMPI support for virtual interfaces.
The Open MPI FAQ mentions that virtual IP interfaces are not supported and this
will not be solved by using either btl_tcp_if_include or btl_tcp_if_exclude.
(https://www.open-mpi.org/faq/?category=tcp#ip-virtual-
