Rob Latham writes:
> PLFS folks seem to think it's not worth the effort?
>
> https://github.com/plfs/plfs-core/issues/361
I guess they'd know, but I'm a bit puzzled as EMC seemed to be relying
on it (re-named?) fairly recently. It's in the latest ompio anyhow.
On 01/21/2016 05:59 AM, Dave Love wrote:
:-), but what about plfs, which seems a notable omission? The patches
in the plfs distribution don't apply to recent adio, at least the
version in ompi 1.8 as far as I remember. I wonder if there's any
chance of fixing that and including it, assuming
Rob Latham writes:
> We didn't need to deploy PLFS at Argonne: GPFS handled writing N-to-1
> files just fine (once you line up the block sizes), so I'm beholden to
> PLFS communities for ROMIO support.
I guess GPFS has improved in that respect, as I think it benefited
originally. Is it known w
On 01/21/2016 05:59 AM, Dave Love wrote:
[Catching up...]
Rob Latham writes:
Do you use any of the other ROMIO file system drivers? If you don't
know if you do, or don't know what a ROMIO file system driver is, then
it's unlikely you are using one.
What if you use a driver and it's not on
[Catching up...]
Rob Latham writes:
> Do you use any of the other ROMIO file system drivers? If you don't
> know if you do, or don't know what a ROMIO file system driver is, then
> it's unlikely you are using one.
>
> What if you use a driver and it's not on the list? First off, let me
> know
Hi Rob
Your email says you'll keep PVFS2.
However, on your blog PVFS2 is not mentioned (on the "Keep" list).
I suppose it will be kept, right?
Thank you,
Gus Correa
On 01/05/2016 12:31 PM, Rob Latham wrote:
I'm itching to discard some of the little-used file system drivers in
ROMIO, an MPI-IO
I'm itching to discard some of the little-used file system drivers in
ROMIO, an MPI-IO implementation used by, well, everyone.
I've got more details in this ROMIO blog post:
http://press3.mcs.anl.gov/romio/2016/01/05/cleaning-out-old-romio-file-system-drivers/
Right now the plan is to keep t
