Re: [OMPI users] meaning of MPI_THREAD_*

2010-12-14 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 6, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote: > Thanks, it is now clarified that a call to MPI_INIT has the same effect as a > call to MPI_INIT_THREAD with > a required = MPI_THREAD_SINGLE. Perhaps it should be added here: > http://www.open-mpi.org/doc/v1.4/man3/MPI_Init_thread.3.php > as w

Re: [OMPI users] meaning of MPI_THREAD_*

2010-12-06 Thread Hicham Mouline
    -Original Message- From: "Tim Prince" [n...@aol.com] List-Post: users@lists.open-mpi.org Date: 06/12/2010 01:40 PM To: us...@open-mpi.org Subject: Re: [OMPI users] meaning of MPI_THREAD_* >On 12/6/2010 3:16 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote: >> Hello, >> >>

Re: [OMPI users] meaning of MPI_THREAD_*

2010-12-06 Thread Tim Prince
On 12/6/2010 3:16 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote: Hello, 1. MPI_THREAD_SINGLE: Only one thread will execute. Does this really mean the process cannot have any other threads at all, even if they doen't deal with MPI at all? I'm curious as to how this case affects the openmpi implementation? Essentiall

[OMPI users] meaning of MPI_THREAD_*

2010-12-06 Thread Hicham Mouline
Hello, 1. MPI_THREAD_SINGLE: Only one thread will execute. Does this really mean the process cannot have any other threads at all, even if they doen't deal with MPI at all? I'm curious as to how this case affects the openmpi implementation? Essentially, what is the difference between MPI_THREAD_S