now. Dang those smp systems. :-)
Ja, ist definitely confusing...
>
> -cdm
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
>> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph H Castain
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:57 AM
>> T
M
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
>
>
>
>
> On 12/12/06 9:18 AM, "Maestas, Christopher Daniel"
>
> wrote:
>
> > Ralph,
> >
> > I figured I should of run an mpi program ...here's what it
> do
tent. Make sense?
Ralph
>
> What you describe makes sense to me. Thanks!
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org
>> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
>> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:27 PM
>> To: Open
s-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 10:27 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
>
> Hi Chris
>
> I have also implemented --npernode N now as well - it is in
> the trunk as of
> r12826.
>
>
oes on the second node, etc.
>> until I get one
>> on each node; then I wrap back to the beginning and do this
>> again until I
>> get the specified number of procs on each node.
>>
>> Correct?
>> Ralph
>>
>>> Ralph,
>>
>>> I agree w
rg
> [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Castain
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:41 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
>
> Hi Chris
>
> Okay, we have modified the pernode behavior as you requested
> (on the tr
half Of Ralph Castain
>>Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:01 AM
>>To: Open MPI Users
>>Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
>>
>>Hi Chris
>>
>>Thanks for the patience and the clarification - much appreciated. In
>>fact, I have someone that needs to l
: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 8:01 AM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
Hi Chris
Thanks for the patience and the clarification - much appreciated. In
fact, I have someone that needs to learn more about the code base, so I
think I will assign this to him. At the least, he will
Hi Chris
Thanks for the patience and the clarification - much appreciated. In fact, I
have someone that needs to learn more about the code base, so I think I will
assign this to him. At the least, he will have to learn a lot more about the
mapper!
I have no problem with modifying the pernode beha
Ralph,
Thanks for the feedback. Glad we are clearing these things up. :-)
So here's what osc mpiexec is doing now:
---
-pernode : allocate only one process per compute node
-npernode : allocate no more than processes per
compute node
---
> Cdm> I think I originally requested the -pernode
pi.org] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Castain
> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:27 PM
> To: Open MPI Users
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
>
> We already have --pernode, which spawns one process per node. You can
> also launch one process/slot across all available slo
Thanks for the feedback Ralph. Comments below.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On
Behalf Of Ralph Castain
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:27 PM
To: Open MPI Users
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Pernode request
We already have
We already have --pernode, which spawns one process per node. You can also
launch one process/slot across all available slots by simply not specifying
the number of processes.
I gather this option would say "spawn N procs/node across all nodes" - I can
understand the possible usefulness, but I'm n
13 matches
Mail list logo
