Re: [OMPI users] round-robin scheduling question [hostfile]

2009-02-23 Thread Raymond Wan
Hi Ralph, Ralph Castain wrote: ... The man page will describe all the various options. Which one is best for your app really depends on what the app is doing, the capabilities and topology of your cluster, etc. A little experimentation can help you get a feel for when to use which one. Th

Re: [OMPI users] round-robin scheduling question [hostfile]

2009-02-21 Thread Ralph Castain
On Feb 21, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Raymond Wan wrote: Hi Ralph, Thank you very much for your explanation! Ralph Castain wrote: It is a little bit of both: * historical, because most MPI's default to mapping by slot, and * performance, because procs that share a node can communicate via shared

Re: [OMPI users] round-robin scheduling question [hostfile]

2009-02-21 Thread Raymond Wan
Hi Ralph, Thank you very much for your explanation! Ralph Castain wrote: It is a little bit of both: * historical, because most MPI's default to mapping by slot, and * performance, because procs that share a node can communicate via shared memory, which is faster than sending messages over

Re: [OMPI users] round-robin scheduling question [hostfile]

2009-02-20 Thread Ralph Castain
It is a little bit of both: * historical, because most MPI's default to mapping by slot, and * performance, because procs that share a node can communicate via shared memory, which is faster than sending messages over an interconnect, and most apps are communication-bound If your app is di