[OMPI users] Open MPI 1.8.1: "make all" error: symbol `Lhwloc1' is already defined

2014-08-10 Thread Jorge D'Elia
Hi, I tried to re-compile Open MPI 1.8.1 version for Linux on an ia32 machine with Fedora 14 although using the last version of Gfortran (Gfortran 4.10 is required by a user program which runs ok). However, the "make all" phase breaks with the error message: Error: symbol `Lhwloc1' is alre

[OMPI users] problem compiling openmpi-1.8.1 on Mac running Mavericks

2014-08-10 Thread Yang, David
Hi, I have encountered a problem compiling openmpi 1.8.1 on a Mac running Mavericks. When I ran ./configure, I got the following error. == Configuring Open MPI ===

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.8.1: "make all" error: symbol `Lhwloc1' is already defined

2014-08-10 Thread Ralph Castain
You might try the 1.8.2 release candidate and see if that helps - some fortran changes were in there. On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Jorge D'Elia wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to re-compile Open MPI 1.8.1 version for Linux > on an ia32 machine with Fedora 14 although using the > last version of Gfo

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.8.1: "make all" error: symbol `Lhwloc1' is already defined

2014-08-10 Thread Yang, David
No, I got the same error. David Correspondence/TSPA On Aug 10, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Ralph Castain wrote: > You might try the 1.8.2 release candidate and see if that helps - some > fortran changes were in there. > > On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Jorge D'Elia wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I tried

[OMPI users] Open MPI disappeared after Mavericks upgrade

2014-08-10 Thread Yang, David
Hi, I just upgraded my Mac from Mountain Lion to Mavericks. Before upgrading, I had Open MPI installed on the Mac, though I don’t quite remember where, probably under /usr/local/. After upgrading, I can no longer find the installation. For example, when I type “which mpirun”, I got "mpirun: Com

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI disappeared after Mavericks upgrade

2014-08-10 Thread Douglas L Reeder
David, Try “locate mpirun”, or “find / -name mpirun -print. Doug On Aug 10, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Yang, David wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded my Mac from Mountain Lion to Mavericks. Before upgrading, I > had Open MPI installed on the Mac, though I don’t quite remember where, > probably under /

Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.8.1: "make all" error: symbol `Lhwloc1' is already defined

2014-08-10 Thread Jorge D'Elia
Ralph, No, like David, with the 1.8.2 release candidate, I also get the same error ... Jorge. - Mensaje original - > De: "David Yang" > Para: "Open MPI Users" > Enviados: Domingo, 10 de Agosto 2014 13:40:11 > Asunto: Re: [OMPI users] Open MPI 1.8.1: "make all" error: symbol > `

Re: [OMPI users] problem compiling openmpi-1.8.1 on Mac running Mavericks

2014-08-10 Thread Ralph Castain
Odd - I just downloaded and built the 1.8.2rc3 tarball on Mavericks without trouble. I'll have to look at the log and see where our differences might lie Do you have Xcode installed? It's required even with the gcc compiler. On Aug 10, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Yang, David wrote: > Hi, > > I have en

[OMPI users] OpenMPI fails with np > 65

2014-08-10 Thread Lenny Verkhovsky
Hi all, Trying to run OpenMPI ( trunk Revision: 32428 ) I faced the problem running OMPI with more than 65 procs. It looks like MPI failes to open 66th connection even with running `hostname` over tcp. It also seems to unrelated to specific host. All hosts are Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS mpirun -np 66 -

Re: [OMPI users] OpenMPI fails with np > 65

2014-08-10 Thread Ralph Castain
Looks to me like your 65th host is missing the dstore library - is it possible you don't have your paths set correctly on all hosts in your hostfile? On Aug 10, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Lenny Verkhovsky wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to run OpenMPI ( trunk Revision: 32428 ) I faced the problem running

Re: [OMPI users] MPI-I/O issues

2014-08-10 Thread Mohamad Chaarawi
Update: George suggested that I try with the 1.8.2 rc3 and that one resolves the hindexed_block segfault that I was seeing with ompi. the I/O part now works with ompio, but needs the patches from Rob in ROMIO to work correctly. The 2nd issue with collective I/O where some processes participat