No objections from my part. I can’t imagine anyone would object, but I’ll ask
in the dev community as well.
If there are any questions / discussion where you need someone from our side to
answer comments, let me know and I can join the discussion on the OSI list.
> On May 21, 2025, at 7:06 P
Just a note to the user base:
I this week submitted the Open MPI license (which has a SPDX identifier of
BSD-3-Clause-Open-MPI in part because it is a variant of the BSD 3-Clause
license) for inclusion in the list of Open Source Initiative (OSI) approved
open source licenses.
You can see the dis
Wow, cool! Many thanks for doing that.
I can probably be contacted with questions, but I am most definitely not a
lawyer.
Per the 2nd and 3rd messages on that thread, do you need me to join that list?
If so, I’d probably join it for limited time (i.e., just for the duration of
that discussio
FWIW if there is any objection to me doing this from Open MPI, let me
know as I'd want to let OSI know. I'm assuming you wouldn't but don't
know for sure.
On 5/21/2025 2:34 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Wow, cool! Many thanks for doing that.
I can probably be contacted with questions, but I am mos
up to you if you want to or not. TBH I doubt there is going to be a lot
of discussion this license is pretty straightforward and I don't see any
reason for the list to have any issues.
On 5/21/2025 2:34 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Wow, cool! Many thanks for doing that.
I can probably be contacte
