Dear Christophe,
We prepared a post [1] with a description of our position as
open-source project when OpenStack was announced in July. From a more
technical point of view, OpenNebula is a mature technology (we started
the development five years ago and did our first release almost three
years
Nova (the part of OpenStack that compares with OpenNebula) is *very*
immature at the moment. It's a brand-spanking new project only a few months
old, and doesn't really do much at the moment. In the long run, it may
compare favorably with OpenNebula, but it will be at least 6 months before
Nova
Keith,
I cannot agree with you more.
There is NO virtual infrastructure manager more hackable than OpenNebula!
Shi
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Keith Hudgins ke...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
Nova (the part of OpenStack that compares with OpenNebula) is *very*
immature at the moment. It's a
Hi Steven,
This is an interesting use-case. When we designed the image repository, we
had to make a compromise between expectable behaviour and advanced
customization usage. I guess this falls into the advanced usage, but
OpenNebula is flexible enough to take this challenge.
To automatically
Hi,
I got it. Somehow if the output is
in multiple lines, it does not work.
Yeah, same here :| ...
OpenNebula can produce the XML output both using the Nokogiri gem or
REXML if Nokogiri is not found. I'm using Nokogiri with the last git
version and all CDATA content I can see is on
Christophe Hamerling - Petals Link christophe.hamerl...@petalslink.com wrote:
As an active open source developer and supporter I have no doubt about the
quality and maturity of OpenNebula.
I was just wondering if any user as also experience with OpenStack and can say
more about why they
Superb! Thank you very much.
Shi
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Molina Aranda
danmo...@fdi.ucm.eswrote:
Hi,
This issue is fixed here:
http://dev.opennebula.org/issues/381
In the next maintenance release this change will be included.
Regards.
On 1 December 2010 19:38, Shi Jin
