Re: [one-users] Bonded/trunked interfaces in OpenNebula

2011-11-01 Thread rbabu
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:12 PM, Jaime Melis wrote: > Hello Donny, > > I have been doing a good bit of searching for the answer to this but cannot > seem to find a straight answer. My servers have 4 network cards each. > Currently I have them all bonded/trunked. How does Op

Re: [one-users] Looking at moving to OpenNebula with a few questions

2011-11-01 Thread Fabian Wenk
Hello Donny On 27.10.2011 18:48, Donny Brooks wrote: Currently all machines have their network cards bonded and vlans passed over the trunked interface as we have approximately 20 vlans we use. This should be fairly simple to do with OpenNebula correct? Yes, you need to create bridge interface

[one-users] use of IMAGE_ID and its ilk in 3.0

2011-11-01 Thread Thomas Higdon
In 2.2, in a VM template, I could specify an image for a disk that was in the image repository by using IMAGE = . This behavior appears to have been removed in 3.0, in favor of using IMAGE_ID = , where is an arbitrary number assigned by the opennebula system. This change in behavior seems kind of

Re: [one-users] Ruby oca - change templates

2011-11-01 Thread Paulo A L Rego
Thanks for tips.. This "onetemplate" feature is for 3.0 version, right? I'm using ON2.2 and was trying to add dinamically the context information to a VM in pending state, to simplify to final user. But it seems cant be done in this version. I'm gonna try ON3.0. Regards 2011/11/1 Robert Parrott

Re: [one-users] Ruby oca - change templates

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Parrott
Hi Paulo, One thing that we've done is to use "onetemplate" to store a template " template", i.e. a template that has fields in the context that are placeholder tokens. Then we've wrapped the deploy command line with a script that will pull the contents of the template, modify it in place, and the