Re: [one-users] the synchronous problem between the cancel operation and tm_delete.sh for lxc driver

2012-12-16 Thread Simon Boulet
One note, however, it seems the only way for a user to cancel /delete a Powered off VM is to issue a delete action. If we make the delete action ADMIN-only, we would need to make the cancel action possible for VMs in Poweroff state (currently not possible). Simon On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:10 PM,

Re: [one-users] New contextualization packages

2012-12-16 Thread Gary S. Cuozzo
Thank you for these packages. They work great and are an excellent base. I used both deb & rpm. I customized them to add some features: * setting entries in /etc/hosts file * modified for support of resolvconf package in ubuntu 12.04 * added HOSTNAME context variable * added DOMAINNAME variable

Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

2012-12-16 Thread Simon Boulet
Same issue here, using a custom VMM, so I don't think it's related to KVM specially. For me it seems if I leave the Dashboard page loaded (without hitting refresh in my browser) the numbers seems to make more sense when Sunstone automagically refresh the data a couple seconds / minutes later. My V

Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

2012-12-16 Thread Shankhadeep Shome
Oh ok I do see reasonable numbers from time to time, I guess its the refresh On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Shankhadeep Shome wrote: > yea kvm, ubuntu 12.04 for me as well with 3.8.1 but I swear I saw it > before with older versions, I just didn't care enough to post. > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 201

Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

2012-12-16 Thread Shankhadeep Shome
yea kvm, ubuntu 12.04 for me as well with 3.8.1 but I swear I saw it before with older versions, I just didn't care enough to post. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Gary S. Cuozzo wrote: > I see this also, using Ubuntu 12.04 with KVM, but if I hit the refresh it > goes to reasonable numbers. > >

Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

2012-12-16 Thread Gary S. Cuozzo
I see this also, using Ubuntu 12.04 with KVM, but if I hit the refresh it goes to reasonable numbers. - Original Message - From: "Rodolfo Conte Brufatto" To: "André Monteiro" Cc: "users" Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:37:45 PM Subject: Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth Same here,

Re: [one-users] Sunstone Bandwidth

2012-12-16 Thread Rodolfo Conte Brufatto
Same here, using Ubuntu 12.04 LTS On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, André Monteiro wrote: > Hello, > > I have this problem also, using KVM with SL6.3. > > -- > André Monteiro > > > > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ricardo Duarte wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have this problem too, with KVM and Cen

[one-users] Instanciate cloned templates with restricted attributes

2012-12-16 Thread Simon Boulet
How can a user instantiate a cloned template that contains restricted attributes? My experiments shows that restricted attributes prevent templates owned by a group other than the oneadmin group from being instantiated if it contains a restricted attribute. A user could successfully Clone a oneadm

Re: [one-users] sunstone bug

2012-12-16 Thread Simon Boulet
Similar issue when deleting images from Sunstone, the confirmation message is showing: "This will delete the selected VMs from the database Do you want to proceed?" Should we open a bug for this? Simon On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Gary S. Cuozzo wrote: > Hello, > When deleting a virtual ne

[one-users] contextualization with interface aliases

2012-12-16 Thread Gary S. Cuozzo
Hello, I am contextualizing vms for both ubuntu 12.04 and centos 6.3 and would like to support multiple IP addresses per interface via interface aliasing. For example: eth0 - 192.168.1.1 eth0:1 - 192.168.1.2 etc. I'm currently using the context packages from ONE. Is there a way to specify

Re: [one-users] the synchronous problem between the cancel operation and tm_delete.sh for lxc driver

2012-12-16 Thread Simon Boulet
Hi, On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Ruben S. Montero wrote: > This seems to be confusing, we are thinking of moving the delete > operation to the ADMIN set (so you need admin permissions to delete) > and so force users to use the safer cancel operation... Any thoughts? > Not a bad idea to restri