[one-users] 4.1.80: top pid limit exceeded with more than 20 virtual machines on one node

Hi, The method of getting the cpu usage of the VMs on the nodes is problematic with more than 20 VMs on a node as top is called with the list of pids of the VMs. Unfortunately, the standard system top (in this case Ubuntu 12.04LTS) is limited to 20 pids - so the call throws an error when more

Re: [one-users] How to prepare window 7 image (Contextization)

Hi, Did you check the resources from this mail? The wiki contains a guide on windows guest contextualization. http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2013-July/023731.html Regards -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 http://opennebulaconf.com in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 --

Re: [one-users] error enable host

Hi, The 'onehost show' output may contain an error reason, and you will definitely find better error messages in /var/log/one/oned.log Regards -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 http://opennebulaconf.com in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project Engineer OpenNebula - The

Re: [one-users] changing vm capacity via sunstone and quota

Hi, Looks like you've found a bug, I can confirm it. If the resize operation fails because of the group limits, the user's VM usage is decremented [1]. Can you share a bit more about your quotas? At least the output of oneuser/onegroup show/defaultquota. Regards [1]

Re: [one-users] User Quota

Hi, Regarding your first mail, I wanted to add that even if users have the users or groups tab enabled, they can only list their own user and group. All the other users are not revealed, just like a user cannot see other user's VMs. Regards. -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013

[one-users] CfP 8th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC '13)

we apologize if you receive multiple copies of this CfP = CALL FOR PAPERS 8th Workshop on Virtualization in High-Performance Cloud Computing (VHPC '13) as part of SC 13, Denver, Colorado | sponsored by ACM sighpc

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Hi Michael, PCIBRIDGE=0 will disable the pcibridges. PCIBRDIGE=1 will get you the first pcibrdige (0) present in the VM. Regards, -Tino -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD, MSc Senior Infrastructure Architect at C12G Labs www.c12g.com | @C12G | es.linkedin.com/in/tinova -- Confidentiality

[one-users] (无主题)

2013-07-22 邓少飞___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

So -- then I should look at the drop-down menu for pcibridge as 0 is disabled 1-10 really equals 0-9 in the VM? Michael Curran | connectsolutions | Lead Network Architect Phone 614.568.2285 | Mobile 614.403.6320 | www.connectsolutions.com -Original Message- From: Tino Vazquez

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Hi Michael, 0 means no pcibridge 1 means 1 pcibridge, with ID = 0 (ie pciBridge0.present=TRUE in the .vmx file) 2 means 2 pcibridges with ID = 0 and 1 (ie, both pciBridge0.present=TRUE and pciBridge1.present=TRUE in the .vmx file). and so on... Best, -Tino -- Constantino Vázquez Blanco, PhD,

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

I see -- so based on these raw settings we added last time -- I should set pcibridge to at least 7 ?? RAW=[ DATA_VMX=pciBridge0.present = \TRUE\\npciBridge4.present = \TRUE\\npciBridge4.virtualDev = \pcieRootPort\\npciBridge4.functions = \8\\npciBridge5.present =

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

comments inline, On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Michael Curran michael.cur...@connectsolutions.com wrote: I see -- so based on these raw settings we added last time -- I should set pcibridge to at least 7 ?? RAW=[ DATA_VMX=pciBridge0.present = \TRUE\\npciBridge4.present =

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Okay -- more comments myself -- The pcibridge does get the following settings on creation pciBridge${i}.present = TRUE pciBridge${i}.pciSlotNumber = XX However this is NOT created with it pciBridge${i}.virtualDev = pcieRootPort is not created I will add the virtualDev and the vmci0.present

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

I think I might have nailed down the issue -- but I want to test it in a few iterations ethernet0.virtualDev=e1000 is not being set with the network -- possible feature request for Sunstone network options? Michael Curran | connectsolutions | Lead Network Architect Phone 614.568.2285 | Mobile

Re: [one-users] 4.1.80: top pid limit exceeded with more than 20 virtual machines on one node

Good catch! I am going to change the way we get that information to overcome this problem. Expect a fix for final release. Thanks On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Michael Kutzner michael.kutz...@virtion.de wrote: Hi, The method of getting the cpu usage of the VMs on the nodes is problematic

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Okay -- figured it out -- only these needed to be updated within the template for the NIC to come online Add MODEL=e1000 to the NIC section Add RAW=[ DATA_VMX=vmci0.present = \TRUE\\n, TYPE=vmware ] All good now (hope these are options in

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Then I think something must still be wrong a little bit -- this is what I have in the template definition TEMPLATE 11 INFORMATION ID : 11 NAME : Windows Test3 USER : oneadmin GROUP : oneadmin REGISTER TIME : 07/19 09:57:34 PERMISSIONS OWNER :

Re: [one-users] sunstone uploads

Now that the below is resolved -- Im looking at IEETA windows instructions Where it says hostname= $NAME -- does that variable in context refer the VMID or the name created by sunstone? CONTEXT = [ hostname = $NAME, ip_public = $NIC[IP, NETWORK=\Public\], username = virtualuser files =