Re: [one-users] Recover VM in FAILED state

2013-07-24 Thread Karsten Nielsen
Hi Ruben, OK thanks for the reply. That is what happened. We use ceph for datastorage. So I guess if I delete the VM the image will be deleted as well? Also I do not quit follow how the changes will be preserved and the resources, the disk is not persistent. Thanks, - Karsten On 30/05/13

Re: [one-users] changing vm capacity via sunstone and quota

2013-07-24 Thread Carlos Martín Sánchez
Hi, The problem was clear after a few tests, I don't think we need those outputs anymore. The final 4.2 version will be released pretty soon, including this fix. Thanks -- Join us at OpenNebulaConf2013 http://opennebulaconf.com in Berlin, 24-26 September, 2013 -- Carlos Martín, MSc Project

Re: [one-users] changing vm capacity via sunstone and quota

2013-07-24 Thread Piotr Kandziora
Ok. Thank you. Regards Piotr Kandziora On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Carlos Martín Sánchez cmar...@opennebula.org wrote: Hi, The problem was clear after a few tests, I don't think we need those outputs anymore. The final 4.2 version will be released pretty soon, including this fix.

[one-users] Datastores

2013-07-24 Thread Michael Curran
Can the images DS and the filestore DS be the same physical volume? Or must they be 2 separate volumes? When I try to upload files to the images DS - I get Req:752 UID:0 ImageAllocate result FAILURE Not enough space in datastore I also tested images files - and I get the same error I logged

Re: [one-users] Datastores

2013-07-24 Thread Ruben S. Montero
This error is because of the space left in the datastore. Can you check that datastores are being monitor, and capacity data is get without errors? Are there any error or message relative to monitor datastores in oned.log? What is the size available/total shown in onedatastore show ? Cheers

Re: [one-users] Datastores

2013-07-24 Thread Michael Curran
Ive been on the datastores - I will check the monitor data since that makes the most sense - something must be amiss there My test env has 2 1tb volumes with one image and 2 running VM's - neither is more than 2% used So monitoring seems the likelier culprit - Ill investigate that piece.