thanks for your answer, i will be test and report to you,
On 09/03/2014 04:09 PM, Javier Fontan wrote:
We have not tested that configuration but if you only use persistent
images it may work. Make sure you don't try to do cold migrations as
the checkpoint is saved to the system datastore and pro
We have not tested that configuration but if you only use persistent images
it may work. Make sure you don't try to do cold migrations as the
checkpoint is saved to the system datastore and probably will get some time
to be synchronized with the new node.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Rhesa Ma
Datastore 0 and datastore 2 will be synchronized frontend + nodes (we
just use persistent image) so i think datastore 0 just synchronized
symbolic link.
If we have problem maybe existing storage box (datastore 1) broken, all
vm used new storage box ( datastore 100) will not impact with datastore
Rhesa,
the problem is datastore 0, it's the system datastore. If you move it to
the local nodes, it will not be shared and synchronized across the nodes,
therefore you will lose many benefits like live-migration and instant
persintant image VM deployment.
Why is it that you want to move datastore
Jaime,
Thanks for your reply, now datastore 0 and datastore 2 are in existing
storage box, mounted in frontend + nodes, we want to move datastore 0
and datastore 2 from existing storage box to frontend + nodes, could it
be done?
So in existing storage box just have datastore 1 and in new sto
Hi,
I don't entirely understand the difference between both options, could you
explain in more detail what you mean by distributing the datastore to all
the nodes?
Assuming your configuration is as follows: NFS Server exports datastores 0
and 1 -> Mounted in Frontend + Nodes
I recommend the foll
Guys, please help.
Original Message
Subject:Add New Storage Box
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:21:13 +0700
From: Rhesa Mahendra
To: users@lists.opennebula.org , Javier
Fontan
Guys,
We have plan to add a new storage box, Our existing storage :
/var/lib/one/datast
