Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-05-09 Thread Carlos Martín Sánchez
Hi, On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Christoph Pleger < christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > We have the "logical" OpenNebula level enforcement, and the hypervisor > > level. > > > > First one: the OpenNebula scheduler will not allocate more cpu/memory > than > > the Host rep

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-29 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, > We have the "logical" OpenNebula level enforcement, and the hypervisor > level. > > First one: the OpenNebula scheduler will not allocate more cpu/memory than > the Host reports as available. > > Hypervisor level reservation: cgroups for kvm, credit scheduler for xen, > and the esx cpu sc

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-29 Thread Carlos Martín Sánchez
Hi, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Christoph Pleger < christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm not that much familiar with cgroups, but the way I understand it the > first VM does not get 100%, it will get 1024 shares out of 1536 (2/3 of > cpu > > time). > > Yes, that's ho

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-26 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, > I'm not that much familiar with cgroups, but the way I understand it the first VM does not get 100%, it will get 1024 shares out of 1536 (2/3 of cpu > time). Yes, that's how cgroup works, and I wonder why this is not a conflict with what CPU= in VM Templates means and why the documentati

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-26 Thread Carlos Martín Sánchez
Hi there, On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Christoph Pleger < christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a new question about that. > > > > On http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.8:kvmg, I read about > cgroups: > > > > "So, thanks to cgroups a VM with CPU=0.5 will get h

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-26 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, > I have a new question about that. > > On http://opennebula.org/documentation:rel3.8:kvmg, I read about cgroups: > > "So, thanks to cgroups a VM with CPU=0.5 will get half of the physical CPU > cycles than a VM with CPU=1.0." > > How can a second VM get half of the physical CPU cycles of a

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-25 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, > HOST/CPU is the number of cores reported by the hypervisor x 100; 800 = 8 > cpu cores. > VM Template CPU is the number of Host CPU cores reserved for the VM. So > cpu=0.5 means that the Host will allocate 50 from the CPU total for that > VM. I have a new question about that. On http://o

Re: [one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-16 Thread Carlos Martín Sánchez
Hi, HOST/CPU is the number of cores reported by the hypervisor x 100; 800 = 8 cpu cores. VM Template CPU is the number of Host CPU cores reserved for the VM. So cpu=0.5 means that the Host will allocate 50 from the CPU total for that VM. VM Template VCPU is the number of virtual cores the VM guest

[one-users] Relationship of cpu usages

2013-04-15 Thread Christoph Pleger
Hello, from the documentation, it is not clear for me how real CPUs in the cloud nodes, the number of virtual CPUs for a VM and the CPU percentage for a VM are related to each other. Can someone explain that, please? Regards Christoph ___ Users maili