...@outlook.com
Date: Tuesday, September 3, 2013 14:15
To: users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
users@lists.opennebula.orgmailto:users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] persistent vs. non persistent
Hi,
i already used persistent image setting, but why it didn't retain
What the difference between non persistent and persistent image?
-
are the changes not saved on a non persistent image?
- is one faster
than the other?
--
Thanks,
Kenneth
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opennebula.org
Hi,
As you said, the main difference is that persistent Images will retain the
changes made when the VM is shutdown. Because of this, persistent Images
can only be used by one VM at a time, while non-persistent ones can be used
by several VMs.
A persistent Image will have a faster deploying time
Kenneth, if you use qcow2 copy-on-write with a preplaced or shared base
image, non-persistent VMs will be as fast as persistent ones with shared TM.
Gerard Bernabeu
FermiCloud and FermiGrid Services at Fermilab
Phone (+1) 630-840-6509
On 09/03/2013 08:41 AM, Carlos Martín Sánchez wrote:
Hi,
...@fnal.gov
To: cmar...@opennebula.org
CC: users@lists.opennebula.org
Subject: Re: [one-users] persistent vs. non persistent
Kenneth, if you use qcow2 copy-on-write
with a preplaced or shared base image, non-persistent VMs will be
as fast as persistent ones with shared
