Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

Klaus Darilion writes: > Does NAT devices keep TCP bindings open for 20 minutes if there is no > traffic? yes, most nats have much longer tcp timeouts than udp timeouts. -- juha ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.or

Re: [OpenSER-Users] openxcap - GET a document

Reinhold Buchinger schrieb: > Hi, > > I'm trying to fetch a document from the openxcap server with a normal > browser. > My openxcap configuration uses the database backend and I created a db > table equal to the xcap table used in OpenSER. > For testing I inserted some data but I'm not sure w

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Drop reply

Isn't it possible to drop provisional responses? http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:devel#drop klaus Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: > Hi Alex, > > No this in not possible. In statefull mode, the server has not send a > reply to the client. > > regards, > bogdan > > Alex Herm

Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

Juha Heinanen schrieb: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > I cannt comment on the battery life issue, but the problem is with IP > > fragmentation. > > tcp's better battery life may be related to the fact that if the phone > is behind nat, the phone itself will keepthe nat binding open by send

[OpenSER-Users] Checking Reply to INVITE

I need to be able to check the SIP response code to INVITE messages only. I don't care about BYE, CANCEL or anything else. I tried putting a hint header in the INVITE when I sent it out, but the replies came back from the upstream provider with the header removed. I tried setting a flag when an I

Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I cannt comment on the battery life issue, but the problem is with IP > fragmentation. tcp's better battery life may be related to the fact that if the phone is behind nat, the phone itself will keepthe nat binding open by sending every 20 MINUTES or so a keepalive

[OpenSER-Users] $ruri PV missing from pseudovariables wiki page

Hi all, It seems that somehow the description for $ruri PV is missing from the pseudovariables wiki page. Regards, Ovidiu Sas ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

[OpenSER-Users] carrierroute Error

I am attempting to use carrierroute for the first time, and the problem that I am having is that when I attempt to place a call, I see the following in stderror: /usr/local/sbin/openser[32664]: New request - M=INVITE RURI= sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] F=sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] T= sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IP=2

Re: [OpenSER-Users] CPL + DBTEXT

Ok, here's ths most basic of many scripts I've attempted to get working: On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > are you sure the script you uploaded is correct? how did you do it? via MI > command or REGISTER? Can you post the C

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Mediaproxy --help required

On Nov 12, 2007 9:40 AM, srinivas Antarvedi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all , > > i have doubts regarding the mediaproxy > > do i have to run my openser server on public ip if i need to use > the mediaproxy server on the same box as that of openser? > yes you need to run on public IP and

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER CVS

Hi, If there are good arguments against, Wednesday 14th, 12:00 AM GMT, the CVS repository from SF will be disabled. Regards, Bogdan ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSER-Users] testing null AVPs

Hello, On 11/12/07 19:00, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > Hi all, > > How should we test for non existing AVPs? > method 1: is_avp_set("$avp(i:123)") > method 2: $(avp(i:123)) != null > > Both of the above methods are working. > Is there a difference between them? > If no, then maybe is_avp_set should be depr

[OpenSER-Users] testing null AVPs

Hi all, How should we test for non existing AVPs? method 1: is_avp_set("$avp(i:123)") method 2: $(avp(i:123)) != null Both of the above methods are working. Is there a difference between them? If no, then maybe is_avp_set should be deprecated. Regards, Ovidiu Sas __

Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

Well -- this kind of surprises me. I would explain that of myself as the handset guys were worried about UDP timers in firewalls being set more aggressively, and addressed that by more frequent keep-alives for UDP which consume more power, that's still guessing though. -jiri At 13:20 12/11/2007,

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Drop reply

Hi Alex, No this in not possible. In statefull mode, the server has not send a reply to the client. regards, bogdan Alex Hermann wrote: > Hello all, > > is it possible to completely drop a reply from failure_route? I know it is > possible to change the reply with t_reply, but I need the possib

[OpenSER-Users] openxcap - GET a document

Hi, I'm trying to fetch a document from the openxcap server with a normal browser. My openxcap configuration uses the database backend and I created a db table equal to the xcap table used in OpenSER. For testing I inserted some data but I'm not sure what the fields "source" and "doc-uri" shoul

[OpenSER-Users] Drop reply

Hello all, is it possible to completely drop a reply from failure_route? I know it is possible to change the reply with t_reply, but I need the possibility to send nothing back to the UAC. -- Greetings, Alex Hermann ___ Users mailing list Users@list

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Digest Authentication and nonce count

Daniel-Constantin Mierla schrieb: > Hello, > > On 11/12/07 13:49, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Hi! >> >> the ..._challenge() functions support adding the qop=auth to the >> challenge. >> >> This will cause the SIP client to use the nonce count in the digest >> response. Is this nonce count actuall

Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

> I came accros one Nokia-S60 Guideline regarding SIP setting in the > NAT/Firewall traversal section which say:"It is recommended to use TCP > as the transport instead of UDP since even doubled battery life can be > achieved with a UI always connected to a SIP service". I cannt comment on the bat

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Digest Authentication and nonce count

Hello, On 11/12/07 13:49, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi! > > the ..._challenge() functions support adding the qop=auth to the challenge. > > This will cause the SIP client to use the nonce count in the digest > response. Is this nonce count actually used in openser? it is used :-), but maybe not str

[OpenSER-Users] Digest Authentication and nonce count

Hi! the ..._challenge() functions support adding the qop=auth to the challenge. This will cause the SIP client to use the nonce count in the digest response. Is this nonce count actually used in openser? I guess this would require stateful handling of nonce and nonce-count. regards klaus

Re: [OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

I encountered few problems using Nokia's UDP implementation when there are NATs around so I would recommend you to use TCP. Maybe recent versions have solved this issue but you can find older implementations on the field... Regarding reliability and batery life I would say TCP is more reliable by i

[OpenSER-Users] TCP better than UDP??

Hi, I came accros one Nokia-S60 Guideline regarding SIP setting in the NAT/Firewall traversal section which say:"It is recommended to use TCP as the transport instead of UDP since even doubled battery life can be achieved with a UI always connected to a SIP service". I need OPenSER users to commen

Re: [OpenSER-Users] CPL + DBTEXT

Hi Chris, are you sure the script you uploaded is correct? how did you do it? via MI command or REGISTER? Can you post the CPL script you tried? regards, bogdan Chris Heiser wrote: > Bogdan, > > With both DBTEXT and MySQL backing CPL, I'm still getting the > following error: > > ERROR:cpl_c:ru

Re: [OpenSER-Users] SIP Response code in a Failure Route Block

Hi all, $rr is a shortcut the the reply reason of the currently processed reply. But in failure route you do not process a reply, but a request (you re-process the original request, in case of failure). so, none of the PVs related to reply info will work. As already suggested, use $T_reply_cod

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Forking based on XML document in SDP

Hi Pascal, haven't tried to remove the body of a message, but see if subst_body() works for this purpose: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.3.x/textops.html#AEN245 If it does, not you need to remove the content-type header and update the content-length one (to 0). http://www.openser