Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Robert Dyck writes: > Speaking of Twinkle, that is the UA I was referring to in my previous > post on this thread. During a re-INVITE it does not return an > Record-Route list with its 200 OK. This does not violate the spec but > it causes inter-working problems with asterisk because asterisk

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Jiri Kuthan
At 23:51 18/11/2007, Robert Dyck wrote: >On Sunday 18 November 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: >> Jiri Kuthan writes: >> > just wondering if you can refer me to some common-sense sip ua? >> > (I agree with your point, I'm just painfuly anaware of such a ua.) >> >> jiri, >> >> try twiinkle. >> >> -- ju

[OpenSER-Users] [CPL] ERROR:core:set_dst_uri: not enough pkg memory

2007-11-18 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
I have a simple CPL for a user "200" that just should lookup for the contact in the "location" table: In the script I do: cpl_run_script("incoming","FORCE_S

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Robert Dyck
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Jiri Kuthan writes: > > just wondering if you can refer me to some common-sense sip ua? > > (I agree with your point, I'm just painfuly anaware of such a ua.) > > jiri, > > try twiinkle. > > -- juha Speaking of Twinkle, that is the UA I was refe

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Jiri Kuthan writes: > just wondering if you can refer me to some common-sense sip ua? > (I agree with your point, I'm just painfuly anaware of such a ua.) jiri, try twiinkle. -- juha ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.opens

Re: [OpenSER-Users] openser SBC and upper registration.

2007-11-18 Thread Ovidiu Sas
This issue was already discussed. Check the following link: http://lists.openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-May/010857.html Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Nov 16, 2007 6:53 PM, rohail khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well save() does not work on reply route, its for request route , what I did > is from r

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Aymeric Moizard
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: El Domingo, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, Juha Heinanen escribió: Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: >> defining an outbound >> proxy should imply that the ua refuses to talk with anybody else. >> > > Sure of that? does this behaviour appear in any RFC and so?

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Domingo, 18 de Noviembre de 2007, Juha Heinanen escribió: > Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: > > > defining an outbound > > > proxy should imply that the ua refuses to talk with anybody else. > > > > > > Sure of that? does this behaviour appear in any RFC and so? > > it is a common sense implemen

Re: [OpenSER-Users] record_route() for responses

2007-11-18 Thread Jiri Kuthan
At 03:36 18/11/2007, Juha Heinanen wrote: >Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: > > > > defining an outbound > > > proxy should imply that the ua refuses to talk with anybody else. > > > Sure of that? does this behaviour appear in any RFC and so? > >it is a common sense implementation issue of a sip ua, no

Re: [OpenSER-Users] openxcap - GET a document

2007-11-18 Thread Reinhold Buchinger
Hi, Yes, there is a minimal logging but I have no clue how to increase the log level (I couldn't find any hint in the documentation). Could it be that I can't use a normal web-browser for getting a document? Regards, Reinhold Klaus Darilion schrieb: > What about logging in openxcap? I gues it w