Hello,
A little green here, looking for guidance.
I have a simple UA server that can respond to invites. It will respond with
a 302 (temp. moved) to free up 5060 for the next invite. It uses only TCP
for RTP transport.
I am trying to use OpenSER with RTPProxy to be a, well, RTP proxy.
Hello,
A little green here, looking for guidance.
I have a simple UA server that can respond to invites. It will respond with
a 302 (temp. moved) to free up 5060 for the next invite. It uses only TCP
for RTP transport.
I am trying to use OpenSER with RTPProxy to be a, well, RTP proxy.
Hi Bogdan,
alright, thanks.
If you need more information about the machine or want me to try something
else, please let me know.
Best regards
Sebastian
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Sent: Mo 2/11/2008 18:49
To: Schumann Sebastian
Cc: users@lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Compilati
Hi Sebastian,
I will investigate - on a first look, there are some strange things in
the Makefile..
Regards,
Bogdan
Schumann Sebastian wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> sure I can, could have thought about that in the first place myself.
> Sorry for that,
>
> here the working output after starting ma
I solved this one thanks..it was a UA related issue
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ali Jawad
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 5:08 PM
To: users@lists.openser.org
Subject: [OpenSER-Users] Logon prob when username is all numbers
Hi All
When I logon using userna
Hi All
When I logon using usernames with letters all is fine when I logon using
usernames all numbers I get the following error and the UA does not
logon
Registration Error: 501 Not Implemented
This is my config
http://pastebin.com/md7d0de4
It used to work with this config
http
On Monday 11 February 2008, Francisco Seratti wrote:
> [..]
> I cant find the core generated by openser. Where is
> the default dir where this cores are saved?
Hi,
the core (if you enabled it) is generated in the working dir of openser if
this is writeable by the process. If you don't specify a
Hi Francisco,
Please repost this on the correct email list which is "devel".
Thanks and regards,
Bogdan
Francisco Seratti wrote:
> Hello,
> Im coding a module for my needs, and one of them is to
> modify the SIP message after querying some db.
> I decided to use the function replace_all() export
Hello,
Im coding a module for my needs, and one of them is to
modify the SIP message after querying some db.
I decided to use the function replace_all() exported
by the textops module, using the find_export()
function declared in sr_module.h.
The problem is that im getting a SIGSEGV when some
child
On Monday 11 February 2008 15:11:05 A.smith wrote:
> have to read up on the onreply_option to fully understand it.
In "on_reply_route[ ]" section you can modify the SIP replies to the SIP
requests processed.
But sure **the best** you can do is read the doc about it:
http://www.openser.org/docs
Hi Iñaki,
thanks alot for the pointer, did a quick search for onreply_route and
found this article:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+And+Mediaproxy
By using the route from this example and fixing it to use mediaproxy in all
situations I finally have my RTP routing via the mediaproxy
On Monday 11 February 2008 13:55:35 Ali Jawad wrote:
> Dear Iñaki
>
> Sorry for the phrasing, yes I meant in case of symmetric NAT would
> mediaproxy solve the natting problem. I got the main idea, thanks a lot for
> your help
Yes, RTP/MediaProxy solution works with symmetric NAT ;)
--
Iñaki Ba
On Monday 11 February 2008 13:54:31 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Inaki,
>
> I think you made a small confusion here. t_relay() returns -5 and not
> lookup() - so you need to check the return of t_relay after the lookup
opsss, yep, sure it was a very stupid confusion of mine (I need a second
co
Thanks Henning for the hint, I have read through the docs, can anyone
please confirm my findings
> modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 1)
Should be
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:localhost:25061") "If
mediaproxy is running UDP on port 25061"
And according to
http://www.open
On Monday 11 February 2008, Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi All I am trying to configure mediaproxy to be used with OpenSER 1.3
> following the tutorial from
>
> http://siprouter.onsip.org/doc/gettingstarted/ch08.html#id2660207
>
> So far I got two errors
>
> modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 1)
>
>
Hi All I am trying to configure mediaproxy to be used with OpenSER 1.3
following the tutorial from
http://siprouter.onsip.org/doc/gettingstarted/ch08.html#id2660207
So far I got two errors
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_disable", 1)
ERROR:core:set_mod_param_regex: parameter no
Dear Iñaki
Sorry for the phrasing, yes I meant in case of symmetric NAT would mediaproxy
solve the natting problem.
I got the main idea, thanks a lot for your help
Thx
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
Castillo
Sent: Monday, Fe
Hi Inaki,
I think you made a small confusion here. t_relay() returns -5 and not
lookup() - so you need to check the return of t_relay after the lookup
Regards,
bogdan
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I set:
>
>
> ---
> dst_blacklist = gw:{( any , GW_IP, 0
Hi, I set:
---
dst_blacklist = gw:{( any , GW_IP, 0 , "" )}
[...]
t_on_branch("ON_BRANCH_TO_USER");
if (!lookup("location")) {
if ($rc == -5)
xlog("L_WARN", "WARN: Fraudulent Contact !!! \n
On Monday 11 February 2008 13:04:35 Ali Jawad wrote:
> Dear Iñaki
>
> Thanks for your quick reply, you have stated that STUN is transparent and
> once applied OpenSER modules wont detect NAT and therefore wont act upon
> the packets. You also said that both solution can work together.
> Let's
>
Dear Iñaki
Thanks for your quick reply, you have stated that STUN is transparent and once
applied OpenSER modules wont detect NAT and therefore wont act upon the
packets.
You also said that both solution can work together. Let's suppose that STUN did
not help a NAT client..in that case the pro
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:46:17 Ali Jawad wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> I was wondering about the rtpproxy and mediaproxy modules, if I do use
> either of them to allow clients behind NAT to do VOIP calls does that
> mean that I do not need to use a STUN server anymore ?
>
> Or should I use both a ST
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:38:39 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to use blacklist but don't find the function
> "set_blacklist()" in OpenSer 1.3. I've done a full search in the code
> without finding it. Has it a different name now?
It seems to be "use_blacklist()" now :)
More info:
Hi All
I was wondering about the rtpproxy and mediaproxy modules, if I do use
either of them to allow clients behind NAT to do VOIP calls does that
mean that I do not need to use a STUN server anymore ?
Or should I use both a STUN server and the rtp proxy ?
What would provide the best solu
Hi, I'm trying to use blacklist but don't find the function "set_blacklist()"
in OpenSer 1.3. I've done a full search in the code without finding it. Has
it a different name now?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Users mailing list
Hi Bogdan,
sure I can, could have thought about that in the first place myself.
Sorry for that,
here the working output after starting make without debug mode:
netra120:/usr/local/src/openser# make prefix=/usr/local all
Compiling blacklists.c
gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wall -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtu
Actually, both methods can be better understood by looking at the "FOO"
RFC
(take a look at RFC3092 : http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3092.txt)
Also, FOOBAR is referenced by RFC 2577, ("FTP Operation Over Big Address
Records")
and explained in RFC 1639 (http://rfc.dotsrc.org/rfc/rfc1639.html).
Have
Hi Helmut,
are you using the same socket name for both openser's ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Helmut Kuper wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I found that starting a 2nd openser with same config as a already
> running openser on same machine and using module mi_datagram de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I found that starting a 2nd openser with same config as a already
running openser on same machine and using module mi_datagram deletes the
socket file of the already running openser process.
This is very bad when u use openser as a frontend for s
29 matches
Mail list logo
