So I got it working, and I'm trying to figure out why what I did worked.
I took a closer look at the packet captures where I saw what I thought was
the polling. It wasn't actually good traffic, but rather the master
thinking that it had a connection open to the registry server. Checking
netstat on
Ok, I ran a packet capture on both the master and the docker registry and I
see periodic traffic from the master to the docker container on port 5000.
It's about every 30 seconds or so, so I'm assuming that it's the periodic
polling. It doesn't appear that it's picking up a difference between the
r
Yes, scheduled=true will poll the upstream registry.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Tony Saxon wrote:
> Ok, that makes sense. But I am understanding correctly that when you use
> scheduled=true that it should periodically poll the source registry and
> pull the latest tag configured if it's ne
Also check 'oc get routes --all-namespaces' just to rule out that the route
got created in another namespace. Also, the traffic needs to be directed to
the node where haproxy is running (not the master).
If the route is not created then one needs to create it, not sure if the
app you created at a '
Hi there,
For development/test purposes, I think "oc cluster up" is the easiest way
to get a cluster running. It simply requires a running docker daemon (and
access to the docker socket, so you either need to be root or your user
added to the "docker" group). There's a demonstration here:
https:/
Have been trying to get a working version of Openshift M5 up and running,
and have been running into trouble.
The ansible installer runs through with no errors, can login and create
app's but cannot get to them. I can see the traffic hit the master but the
browser only gets a refused to connect.
oc
Ok, that makes sense. But I am understanding correctly that when you use
scheduled=true that it should periodically poll the source registry and
pull the latest tag configured if it's newer than what is currently pulled?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Clayton Coleman
wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 16, 20
On Aug 16, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Tony Saxon wrote:
Can someone tell me if I'm understanding the difference between alias=true
and scheduled=true for tagging imagestreams as documented at
https://docs.openshift.org/latest/dev_guide/managing_images.html#adding-tag
?
The way I read it is that alias tru
Can someone tell me if I'm understanding the difference between alias=true
and scheduled=true for tagging imagestreams as documented at
https://docs.openshift.org/latest/dev_guide/managing_images.html#adding-tag
?
The way I read it is that alias true will track the source image tag and
update the
Realized I never replied-all... Re-adding users_list
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Eric Wolinetz wrote:
> Fluentd tries to connect to both "logging-es" | "logging-es-ops" in the
> logging namespace (if you're using the ops deployment) and "kubernetes" in
> the default namespace. I think in
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Frank Liauw wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I followed through the instructions on https://docs.openshift.org/
> latest/install_config/aggregate_logging.html and have setup a 3 node ES
> cluster. Fluentd is also deployed on all my nodes.
>
> I am getting kibana logs on the l
Hello Guys
I thought that project very interesting.
I'm looking for openshift integration too.
Thank you
2016-08-16 10:59 GMT-03:00 v :
> Hello Jonathan,
>
> thank you for you input, it is highly valued.
>
> I have to admit that I did not know of Atomic Registry - looks like a very
> promisin
Hello Jonathan,
thank you for you input, it is highly valued.
I have to admit that I did not know of Atomic Registry - looks like a very
promising project. I am looking forward to seeing Atomic Registry being
integrated into OpenShift. :)
We're using one-registry-per-project because this allo
13 matches
Mail list logo
