Re: Atomic Host support on OpenShift 3.11 and up

2018-09-06 Thread Clayton Coleman
Master right now will be labeled 4.0 when 3.11 branches (happening right now). It’s possible we might later cut a 3.12 but no plans at the current time. Changes to master will include significant changes as the core is rewired with operators - you’ll also see much more focus on preparing openshif

Re: Atomic Host support on OpenShift 3.11 and up

2018-09-06 Thread Daniel Comnea
Clayton, 4.0 is that going to be 3.12 rebranded (if we follow the current release cycle) or 3.13 ? On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 2:34 PM Clayton Coleman wrote: > The successor to atomic host will be RH CoreOS and the community > variants. That is slated for 4.0. > > > On Sep 6, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Ma

Re: Atomic Host support on OpenShift 3.11 and up

2018-09-06 Thread Clayton Coleman
The successor to atomic host will be RH CoreOS and the community variants. That is slated for 4.0. > On Sep 6, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Marc Ledent wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have read in the 3.10 release notes that Atomic Host is deprecated and will > nod be supported starting release 3.11. > > What th

Atomic Host support on OpenShift 3.11 and up

2018-09-06 Thread Marc Ledent
Hi all, I have read in the 3.10 release notes that Atomic Host is deprecated and will nod be supported starting release 3.11. What this means? Is it advisable to migrate all Atomic host vms to "standard" RHEL server? Kind regards, Marc smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatu

Re: Service and route in front of api pods in OpenShift 3.10

2018-09-06 Thread Mickaël Canévet
Yes sure! If acme servers can't join your routers the HTTP challenge can't be validated. Maybe it could be nice to add optional support to this in openshift-ansible: - deploy openshift-acme - create a route in front of the kubernetes service with the proper annotation Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 08:27