Per node pod quotas by pod service type

Hi, Considering the following scenario: One service per pod, 4 services, 4 nodes. So 16 pods across 4 nodes. Pods get deployed across the nodes and Openshift by and large does a great job of making sure things are balanced, however sometimes we end up with a scenario where three of one serv

Re: Canary release via Openshift

Hi Clayton, Cheers for the reply. One to watch out for so. Ronan O Keeffe System Administrator DoneDeal Email: rona...@donedeal.ie Have you DoneDealed yet? <> www.DoneDeal.ie <http://www.donedeal.ie/> Where to find us <http://www.donedeal.ie/> <http://www.faceboo

Re: Canary release via Openshift

Cheers John, Appreciate that. Ronan O Keeffe System Administrator DoneDeal Email: rona...@donedeal.ie Have you DoneDealed yet? <> www.DoneDeal.ie <http://www.donedeal.ie/> Where to find us <http://www.donedeal.ie/> <http://www.facebook.com/DoneDealIreland>

Canary release via Openshift

Hi, Just wondering is it possible via OpenShift for us to do a canary release of an application? e.g. we put a new version of a component live alongside the old version and push a only (tweakable) subset of traffic to the new version? Ultimately I suppose we'd be running two different version

Re: Logs from container app stored to local disk on nodes

r user can write to it. Under the default SCC the > container user/group are randomized. Under the privileged SCC it will > probably be whatever user the Dockerfile indicates (and you can choose an > selinux context in the pod security context if needed). > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at

Re: Logs from container app stored to local disk on nodes

that allows host volumes to your service account (do "oc get > scc" to see the full list, then "oadm policy add-scc-to-user NAME -z default" > to grant access to that SCC to a named service account). > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Ronan O Keeffe <mailto:ron

Logs from container app stored to local disk on nodes

Hi, Just wondering is it possible to have an app living in a container log back to the box the container lives on. Our test set up is as follows: All web apps identical webapp1 > node1 webapp2 > node2 webapp3 > node3 webapp4 > node4 Ideally we'd like logs from the webapp inside a container

Re: Openshift failing to start on second master potential HAProxy issue

? I'd suggest not using one of your masters as the load >> balancer if at all possible. There may be enough knobs in the inventory to >> allow this to work but I don't think this is a setup we've tested. >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Ronan O Keeffe

Re: Openshift failing to start on second master potential HAProxy issue

TCP master2.openshift:pcsync-https->master2.openshift:49619 (CLOSE_WAIT) haproxy 16621 haproxy *802u IPv4 8657812 0t0 TCP master2.openshift:pcsync-https->master2.openshift:49620 (CLOSE_WAIT) . . . lsof -i :8443 | wc -l 39983 All the same for the almost 4 entries. Nothing else

Openshift failing to start on second master potential HAProxy issue

Hi, We are currently attempting to install Openshift Origin via the advanced install method using Ansible. Initially this will be for testing but we hope to move this to production eventually. We are installing two masters and one node as a test. master1.openshift master2.openshift node1.open