Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

Hey, for all the curious people out there: Just wanted to say that pulling via oc new-app or oc run did not work for my v1.2.1 cluster any more after I used this trick. On top of that this trick has permanently messed up something in my cluster because "oadm prune images --confirm" now

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

This is the string flag bug again. We really need to fix this. On Aug 10, 2016, at 4:04 AM, Cesar Wong wrote: Lionel, So is it working for you now? On Aug 9, 2016, at 11:10 PM, Lionel Orellana wrote: Digging through the go libraries used for parsing

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

Yes. On 10 August 2016 at 18:04, Cesar Wong wrote: > Lionel, > > So is it working for you now? > > On Aug 9, 2016, at 11:10 PM, Lionel Orellana wrote: > > Digging through the go libraries used for parsing the command options I > found that setting the

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

Digging through the go libraries used for parsing the command options I found that setting the no_proxy variable like this works: -e \"no_proxy=172.17.0.3,172.17.0.4\" It all comes down to https://golang.org/pkg/encoding/csv which is used by the pflag package. On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 10:31 PM,

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

Setting the log level to 4 I found the following Starting OpenShift using container 'origin' I0809 22:21:26.415373 20151 run.go:143] Creating container named "origin" config: image: openshift/origin:v1.3.0-alpha.2 command: start

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

I guess what I need is a way to configure the proxy as per https://docs.openshift.org/latest/install_config/http_proxies.html#configuring-hosts-for-proxies On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 10:05 AM, Lionel Orellana wrote: > It's been difficult to get a functional poc going with oc

Re: cluster up - reuse registry address

Hi Lionel, You can always reuse the same data/config dirs and keep your service ips: oc cluster up --host-data-dir=blah --host-config-dir=blah --use-existing-config > On Aug 7, 2016, at 9:17 PM, Lionel Orellana wrote: > > Thanks Clayton. > > Would be nice to have a way