hello
I am a user of opensips+mediaproxy. now i am doing account using
mediaprxoy and freeradius.but when i add the radius dictionary . it return
this:
Starting MediaProxy Dispatcher 2.3.2
Twisted is using selectreactor
cannot read the RADIUS configuration file
failed to create MediaProxy Di
hi bay2x1,
You can get the dictionary. opensips in CDRToolof if u have installed
opensips then u can get dictionary.opensips in /etc/opensips of which ever
path you have installed the opensips.
*In .~/freeradius/You need to copy dictionary.opensips*. Then edit the
dictionary file in freera
Hi Ashwini, that was it. Thanks much.
A note to all OPENXCAP`ers not building on Debian: An OS with Python 2.5 or
better is the trick to smooth install. Fedora 10 as opposed to CentOS 5.3
for example.
A list of dependencies and versions used available to anyone that needs.
Thanks again for the h
Hi all!
I am a bit confuse on where to put the dictionaries. I have installed
freeradius and I am using radiusclient-ng for my client. And I think I
messed up all my dictionary copies where can I obtain copy.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/Dictionary-Problem-tp2673704p2
I am facing call drop issue every 4 minutes only to Africa country such as
Ivory Coast, Cameroon. This only happen if i use (!allow_trust) via
permission module instead of (!proxy_authorize) in INVITE message to
Asteirsk. I tried on both OpenSER 1.3 version with Mediaproxy 1 and OpenSIPS
1.4 versi
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi Davis,
>
> David Gilbert wrote:
>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> Opensips is a proxy. A proxy's role is dictated by RFC3261. It's
>>> fast,
>>> lightweight, very scalable, and has some very nice features you're
>>> already
>>> taking advantages of. Bu
Hi,
I'm implementing a route in openser.cfg which sends calls to ENUM
destinations via one SBC. In cases where there is no IP connectivity for
that ENUM calls to be delivered, my SBC fires a timeout sending back to
openser a 504 SIP message reply. In this cases I would like to be able to
implemen
Hi Robert,
Robert Borz wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> I tried it and it works great! Thanks again for your help. :-)
>
glad it worked.
> But one thing... how can I achieve this the other way around?
> use...@domain.de should be able to place calls, which should look as
> originated from one of its "a
Hi Bogdan,
I tried it and it works great! Thanks again for your help. :-)
But one thing... how can I achieve this the other way around?
use...@domain.de should be able to place calls, which should look as originated
from one of its "alias" accounts.
I think it must be as easy as your workaround
I really means exactly what you read. OpenXCAP can store that
information. Whether somebody really puts its there and makes use of
it is not up to OpenXCAP is up to the devices that uses it.
Adrian
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Michael Ciupka wrote:
Hello
but what mean the openxcap homepag
OK.. now I understand!!! :-)
-Messaggio originale-
Da: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org]
Per conto di Chris Maciejewski
Inviato: martedì 21 aprile 2009 14:06
A: users@lists.opensips.org
Oggetto: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Ring Group - Memory Hunt - with
Hello
but what mean the openxcap homepage with this point?:
Supported XCAP applications:
Presence rules (auid = pres-rules, org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules). A
Presence Rules application is an application which uses authorization policies,
also known as authorization rules, to specify what pre
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Michael Ciupka wrote:
Hi
Can me please somebody help me with this understanding problem?
I have opensips with the presence module and openxcap installed and it
starts working pretty good. One thing I dont understand. I want to
have Presence Polcies, so that f.e.
Hi
Can me please somebody help me with this understanding problem?
I have opensips with the presence module and openxcap installed and it
starts working pretty good. One thing I dont understand. I want to have
Presence Polcies, so that f.e. bob can see alice from 10 till 12 a.m OR a that
a thir
2009/4/21 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Hi Chris,
>
> Chris Maciejewski wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to implement a Ring Group with
>> a Memory Hunt ring strategy.
>>
>> The scenario looks as follows:
>>
>> There is a subscriber A, B and C. All of them are members of the same
>> Ring Group.
>>
>> W
There are somewhat ugly ways to do this. I did it in SER v0.9.x but admit my
approach was not very elegant. SER v2 has a module to do sequential hunting in
a more elegant fashion.
In my approach I check if the extension has permission to use call hunting and
if hunting is enabled at this time.
Bogdan,
If I use uac_replace_from in a route already,
how do I change from in further failure_route call handling?
Or I have use a B2BUA for this purpose?
best regards
kaiser
>>
>> 2. use uac_replace_from in request route and failure route:
>> It makes outgoping INVITE with strange from header.
Bogdan,
After calling twice uac_replace_from() in failure route
the 200 OK reply restores the from header as
Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
63.28.2.7:5060;branch=z9hG4bK58da20a7bfb4a3161fe339136a58343d
Record-Route:
From: "k100" ;tag=3449301004-70
Hi Kaiser,
kaiser wrote:
> Bogdan,
>
> We have tested several ways:
>
> 1. use uac_replace_from in failure route only:
> this make redundant "from" header in reply 200 OK.
so you use it only in failure_route, this should be ok - what do you
mean by redundant FROM hdr? can you post a trace ?
>
> 2
Hi Mauro,
yes, you can can obtain a sequential forking, but what Chris is a
parallel forking but with delayed branches.
Regards,
Bogdan
Mauro Davi' wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> and if I can change the qvalue with the lookup function (how with the path
> proposed) I cannot obtain a working sequential f
Bogdan,
We have tested several ways:
1. use uac_replace_from in failure route only:
this make redundant "from" header in reply 200 OK.
2. use uac_replace_from in request route and failure route:
It makes outgoping INVITE with strange from header.
br
kk
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 提到:
> Hi KK,
>
> do
Sorry,
and if I can change the qvalue with the lookup function (how with the path
proposed) I cannot obtain a working sequential forking (i.e. the first call is
sent to the first contact after the ring timeout the call (with the next_branch
function) is forwarded to the second contact and so on
What you can do is:
1) before applying aliases, save the RURI into an AVP
2) do alias ->userXY, do whatever other routing stuff, including
lookup("location");
3) just before sending out the request, do: if $du (destination URI) is
empty, copy the current RURI into $du ($du = $ru); (id $du alread
Hi Bogdan,
yes, that's exactly what I want... :-)
Regards,
Robert.
-Original Message-
From: bog...@voice-system.ro [mailto:bog...@voice-system.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:38 AM
To: robert.b...@web.de
Cc: h...@elnour.biz; users@lists.opensips.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] S
Hi Robert,
you mean, at the end, you want to sent it to use...@domain.de phone, but
with 1...@domain.de in RURI, right ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Robert Borz wrote:
> Hi Bogdan,
>
> could you be more specific here, please?
>
> I want to setup a similar configuration. I want to forward let's say 300
> n
Hi Mauro,
not really (as I understand it). What Chris wants to do is not to start
all branches (for parallel forking) in the same time (as you do), but to
start them one by one (ad different time intervals).
Regards,
bogdan
Mauro Davi' wrote:
> Sorry Bogdan,
>
> If I understand, this is the sc
Hi Franz,
Franz Edler wrote:
> Hi Bogdan and all,
>
>
>> I will post the issue at the eyebeam support forum.
>>
>
> After many struggles I now come back to the OpenSIPS mailing list, because I
> think now that it is a problem of OpenSIPS and not that of the SIP clients.
>
> The problem is,
Hi Julien,
prefix routing - see drouting module
NAT support - nathelper or mediaproxy modules.
Regards,
Bogdan
Julien Chavanton wrote:
>
> Hi, I want to do prefix routing, registration and support NAT
>
> Should I use the following : carrierroute, nathelper and mediaproxy
> Are they still r
Hi Davis,
David Gilbert wrote:
> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> Opensips is a proxy. A proxy's role is dictated by RFC3261. It's fast,
>> lightweight, very scalable, and has some very nice features you're already
>> taking advantages of. But, it's still only a proxy. A proxy needs Via
>
Sorry Bogdan,
If I understand, this is the scenarious that I implemented.
With the lookup function patch (that add the q value to the input parameter,
the same assigned to you) Chris can invoke the lookup function three time with
the three subscriber and obviously three different qvalue. After
Hi Bogdan,
could you be more specific here, please?
I want to setup a similar configuration. I want to forward let's say 300
numbers (sip accounts) to a single SIP account without loosing the R-URI,
because the box receiving the forwarded calls should be able to distinct which
number was diale
Hi Iñaki,
Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El Lunes, 20 de Abril de 2009, David Gilbert escribió:
>
>
>> Can't OpenSIPS be smart and remember the other VIA line as part of the
>> "state" it keeps?
>>
>
> This would require storing the second (and others) Via headers in memory and
> appending t
Hi KK,
do you do uac_replace_from() in other routes than failure_route() ? like
in request route when you process the request for the first time?
Regards,
Bogdan
Gentrice's kaiser wrote:
> Dear Sir:
>
>
> I wrote a failure route for serial call mechanism, it help for no
> answer call ...
>
Hi Chris,
Chris Maciejewski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to implement a Ring Group with
> a Memory Hunt ring strategy.
>
> The scenario looks as follows:
>
> There is a subscriber A, B and C. All of them are members of the same
> Ring Group.
>
> When there is a INVITE to a "Ring Group" Opensips sh
Hi Tamer,
OpenSIPS can deliver as many calls as you want to a single SIP account,
but depends on the device registered with that account (the GS ata) how
to handle the multiple calls.
Regards,
Bogdan
Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi!
> I am new to opensips, and I am looking for a powerfull sip gateway
Hi Uwe,
Actually none of the functions you listed do change the SDP - both are
mangling the signalling part (VIA and Contact headers).
engage_media_proxy() is the function that triggers all the changes in
the SDP part.
Regards,
Bogdan
Uwe Kastens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to call both
>
> for
Hi Bobby,
you can blacklist a user by forbidden it to register (at REGISTER time).
You can use something similar to groups / ACL to know what users to
blacklist. As I guess you do auth before save("location"), use the
"load_credential" auth_db param to load some extra fields from
"subscriber"
Hi Bobby,
you mean the current process is stucked in something.. I suspect in
PQgetResult() trying to read the result. Can you attach with gdb to one
of this blocked processes and get the backtrace (to see where they are
blocked) ?
Regards,
Bogdan
Bobby Smith wrote:
> Removing pgpool from th
Hi Bobby,
Bobby Smith wrote:
> All,
>
> We're currently (successfully) testing a configuration of Opensips as
> a stateless proxy. I wanted to be able to execute an arbitrary
> database query to a database that's NOT the opensips database, when I
> realized the power of the avp_db_query( ) fun
39 matches
Mail list logo
