[OpenSIPS-Users] XCAP documents are not stored - next step

2009-05-09 Thread Franz Edler
Hello all, I meanwhile found an issue in the config.ini file of openxcap. I did not update the "xmlrpc_url" parameter. Now at start of the Eyebeam client the two GET request (for pres-rules and resource-list.xml) are successful but the documents are not visible in the xcap-table. When I do a "SEL

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] [OpenSIPS-Devel] Important Contribution to OpenSIPS

2009-05-09 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
El Domingo, 10 de Mayo de 2009, SAMEER KUMAR escribió: > Dear Mr. Bogdan and OpenSIPS developers and users, > > While working in a team of four, I have made some changes in OpenSIPS and > made it capable of providing multithreaded server. Hi, let me a question: which are the advantages of multi-th

[OpenSIPS-Users] XCAP documents are not stored

2009-05-09 Thread Franz Edler
Hello all, I have the following problem. I have configured an integrated XCAP server (most simple configuration) and register a client with Eyebeam. When the client registers it uploads obviously successfully two XML documents: - PUT /xcap-r...@net1.test/org.openmobilealliance.pres-rules/users/ali

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] DRouting Module and LCR Module

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Mauro, You should consider the dialplan module for this - you can pass as input the RURI ($ru), match the domain part of it via a regexp and do a subst to replace the domain with the IP of the SBC. See: http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.5.x/dialplan.html#id227206 Regards, Bogdan

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Question about sip_trace

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Sergio, Do you set any traced_user_avp ? because setting such a user will automatically enable the tracing. Regards, Bogdan Sergio Gutierrez wrote: > Hello to all members. > > I have a doubt about using siptrace. > > I am configuring siptrace to use trace_dialog feature, but it seems > that

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Location table and received field

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Mauro, The received field is used for NAT traversal purposes. As the contact value cannot be altered (kept exactly as sent by client during registration) and if UAC is natted , the contact is private, so unusable, the USRLOC module keeps the public address of NAT in the "received" field in

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Question about dialog max timeout...

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Marc, It is normal to increase as it is an absolute timestamp - see my prev email on this thread. Regarding the shm mem - do you see the dialogs actually being removed? Regards, Bogdan Marc Leurent wrote: > Sorry for the 3rd email.. but I think it's interesting, because the dialog > timeou

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Question about dialog max timeout...

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Marc, no, that was just a mem leak with no affect on functionality of the module. Regards, Bogdan Marc Leurent wrote: > Do you think it could it be linked with bug id #2787654 ?? I don't think so > but I will rebuild my OpenSIPs with trunk version... > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=d

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Question about dialog max timeout...

2009-05-09 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Marc, Actually the timeout is an absolute time value - the timestamp when the dialog will expire. It is not a relative (to start) value. Regards, Bogdan Marc Leurent wrote: > Hello all, I have juste a small question about the dialog module, I have set > the parameters below for OpenSIPs dia