Hi,
That is more than strange - I will need to put some time and try to
compile the oracle module by myself and to give it a try.
Regards,
Bogdan
happybirdgo wrote:
> Hi, We use OpenSIPS version 1.52
> Oracle lib with OpenSIPS is
> instantclient-basic-linux-x86-64-10.2.0.3-20070103 .
> instant
Hi Ben,
My idea was not to bind the LB to a certain way to of detecting the
needed resources. Instead, you can use any module (dialplan, drouting,
etc) to do it.
Best regards,
Bogdan
Ben Dinnerville wrote:
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>
>
>> you do the resource detection in the script, base
Hi John,
In the dst_uri field you must have a valid SIP URI ; entries 3 and 4 are
not as they miss the "sip:" prefix. This is why you get the parsing
error when opensips is trying to forward to the them.
Regards,
Bogdan
John S. Robinson wrote:
> Hello, all -- I am a nOOb having difficulty debu
Hello, all -- I am a nOOb having difficulty debugging a load
balancing implementation. I must route only to dotted decimal
IP address, because my gateways are not available in DNS.
Any help would be appreciated. I am running opensips-1.5.1-notls
on Linux kernel 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5 / CentOS releas
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> you do the resource detection in the script, based on whatever
> information you have there.
>
> I suggest to use the dialplan module - use rules (in DB) to detect (per
> DID) what resources to be used. Than, in the script you just have to
> trigger LB according t
El Jueves, 6 de Agosto de 2009, Srikanth Rajagopalan escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I need some help from you guys to enable openxcap.
>
> I have an Opensips server with Presence enabled but with no Xcap
> capability, which I want to add now.
> I followed the example in the documentation to change the co
Hi,
I need some help from you guys to enable openxcap.
I have an Opensips server with Presence enabled but with no Xcap capability,
which I want to add now.
I followed the example in the documentation to change the config file. As I saw
that mi_xmlrpc module is also being loaded. I chang
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 17:09:56 Dan Pascu wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:58:32 Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> > > And if you set to "The List", it's very hard to reply to the poster.
> > > Since neither reply to reply-all w
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 17:03:01 Dan Pascu wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 10:07:47 Dan Pascu wrote:
> >
> > I have no problem to setup my Kmail to work with the "List mode", I'll
> > doit as most of list-admins don't wan
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:56:19 Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> Actually,I just checked with gmail on a list with "The List" set and when
> you hit "reply all" it ONLY places the list address in the To:
X-DDD ..., sorry I must laugh ..., Gmail it's a webmail with lot of
funcy "features", but also we
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:58:32 Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> > And if you set to "The List", it's very hard to reply to the poster. Since
> > neither reply to reply-all will get you the email of the poster.
>
> I don't know any mai
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 10:07:47 Dan Pascu wrote:
>
> I have no problem to setup my Kmail to work with the "List mode", I'll doit
> as most of list-admins don't want to change that.
That's contradictory. You first said that 9
Hi Ben,
Ben Dinnerville wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking into using the load balance module to load balance inbound
> calls across a asterisk cluster (We currently use LCR for round robin
> distribution). We offer different services on inbound calls such as
> vxml, voice rec etc which when us
Actually,I just checked with gmail on a list with "The List" set and when
you hit "reply all" it ONLY places the list address in the To:
-Brett
2009/8/5 Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:58:32 Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> > I agree with you here. Even if it's "different
I second that!
Sebastian
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pyle
Sent: Wednesday, 05. August 2009 16:41
To: users@lists.opensips.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] mailing list reply-to : list or send
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 14:58:32 Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> I agree with you here. Even if it's "different" than the way most of your
> other lists work, "Poster" simply makes more sense. And I don't think
> another way should be picked because the poster might do the wrong thing. I
> think it's u
Yep. Seems straight-forward to me.
On 8/5/09 10:03 AM, "Darren Sessions" wrote:
> I agree completely.
>
> - Darren
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
>
>> I agree with you here. Even if it's "different" than the way most of your
>> other lists work, "Poster" simply ma
Alex Balashov wrote:
> If we are going to have a cultured and dignified relationship between
> the Kamailio and OpenSIPS camps, which I assume is the goal of everyone
> for reasons of commercial self-preservation if nothing else, then the
> provocations need to stop from both sides.
I Agree. But
I agree completely.
- Darren
On Aug 5, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
I agree with you here. Even if it's "different" than the way most of
your other lists work, "Poster" simply makes more sense. And I don't
think another way should be picked because the poster might do the
wro
I agree with you here. Even if it's "different" than the way most of your
other lists work, "Poster" simply makes more sense. And I don't think
another way should be picked because the poster might do the wrong thing. I
think it's up to all of us to reply to the list as appropriate.
For me, If I'm
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 08:54:27 Adrian Georgescu wrote:
> Raul,
>
> Your recurrent negative comments on this mailing list about things you
> do not even use are absolutely disgusting.
I use them, but not in production enviroments, because they are useless to me
in their actual implementatio
I try to add a user each other with permission to see the status,
So, the userA insert userB, I do xcap-insert with the docs:
"index.xml":
userB
The pres-rules is:
allow
block
And watchers table is:
| id | presentity_uri| watche
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 10:07:47 Dan Pascu wrote:
> That's in your world. I was never on any mailing list that used "The List".
Uff ... I don't know what to reply to this statement ... nowdays I'm on more
than 60 list, including Debian Project ones, Kernel, VLC and some other high
traffic
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > "The List" is a worse choice than "Poster" because it limits my choice of
> > whom I want to reply to and makes it more complicated to reply to the
> > sender alone. When using "The List", if I want to reply to the sender
> > alon
++
Alex Balashov wrote:
> If we are going to have a cultured and dignified relationship between
> the Kamailio and OpenSIPS camps, which I assume is the goal of everyone
> for reasons of commercial self-preservation if nothing else, then the
> provocations need to stop from both sides.
>
> No,
If we are going to have a cultured and dignified relationship between
the Kamailio and OpenSIPS camps, which I assume is the goal of everyone
for reasons of commercial self-preservation if nothing else, then the
provocations need to stop from both sides.
No, it is not very upstanding to come on
Raul,
Your recurrent negative comments on this mailing list about things you
do not even use are absolutely disgusting. Keep your fancy opinions
for yourself or take them some place else where people enjoy what you
have to say.
On Aug 4, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote
27 matches
Mail list logo
