Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Music On Hold Opensips

Hi, osiris123d wrote: So say RTPProxy can successfully do MOH, if your current VoIP infrastructure uses Mediaproxy then you would need to set up a RTPProxy server and have the customers that wish to have MOH use RTPProxy instead of Mediaproxy correct? sort of I guess the only caveat

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Private IP in registered AOR causing failure

Hi Brian, opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote: 1) the BLA part is sending the SUBSCRIBEs based on user location and it is using the received field if present, so it should be ok. Unless you set in the bla module the outbound param - this will override the received info. I know that at

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] What is protocol/port mismatch?

Hi Brian, Do you use force_send_socket() functions in your script, before the t_relay ? Regards, Bogdan opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote: Hello list, I'm using: Solaris 11 x86 (nv-b91) OpenSIPS 1.6.0 with TLS ...and I see this in the log: warning opensips[2717]:

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Query regarding Rtp Proxy opensips

Hi, I doubt you can change that as RTPproxy is not decoding the RTP stream - as the name says, the tool is only RTP aware, so cannot interpret the content. But I guess you can google for some other audio tools to help mixing the 2 streams. Regards, Bogdan Indiver wrote: Hi Bodgan, Yes.

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Private IP in registered AOR causing failure

Hello Bogdan, An ven., janv 29, 2010, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote: 1) the BLA part is sending the SUBSCRIBEs based on user location and it is using the received field if present, so it should be ok. Unless you set in the bla module the outbound param - this

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] What is protocol/port mismatch?

Hello Bogdan, An ven., janv 29, 2010, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote: ...and I see this in the log: warning opensips[2717]: WARNING:core:get_send_socket: protocol/port mismatch some hundreds of times per day (about once every 20 minutes per registered

[OpenSIPS-Users] B2Bua : send 2 INVITE without caring about the 200 OK

hello, I have a question concerning the B2Bua : I'd like to send 2 INVITE without 200 OK. Indeed I'd like to send the second INVITE even if I haven't received the 200 OK of the first one. But I find that the B2Bua is too much sequetial Is there a solution ? thank you Une messagerie gratuite,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA - Opensips crash on b2b_init_request(top hiding);

Hi Max, I am investigating the reported crash and I will find the problem. I will let you know when it is done to update your code. Thanks and regards, -- Anca Vamanu www.voice-system.ro Max Mühlbronner wrote: Hello everyone, I have a problem with opensips 1.6.1-notls, everything else

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA not passing ACKs

Hi Brian, opensipsl...@encambio.com wrote: Hello Anca, Sorry for the delay. An lun., janv 04, 2010, Anca Vamanu schrieb: There is a misunderstanding from your side in what the b2b scenario documents are concerned ( please read carefully the documentation -

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Experimenting with B2b modules

Hi Jayesh, FIrst of all, the error that those parameters do not exist is normal since they do not exist :). costum_headers is a parameter that was added in devel branch, and the correct name for the other parameter is clean_period. But I have checked now, and in the documentation it is in

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA - Opensips crash on b2b_init_request(top hiding);

Hi again, i have made a recompile/ new setup and still receive a segmentation fault, it was fine for one call and so i thought it was finally working (looked at the trace on another machine and the contact header was modified correctly by B2bua) and then on the next Call it crashed again. I

[OpenSIPS-Users] Problem with miss call logging in radius (radacct) database

-20100129 [detail] /usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct/%{Client-IP-Address}/detail-%Y%m%d expands to /usr/local/var/log/radius/radacct/127.0.0.1/detail-20100129 [detail] expand: %t - Fri Jan 29 10:03:24 2010 ++[detail] returns ok ++[unix] returns noop [radutmp] expand: /usr/local/var/log/radius

[OpenSIPS-Users] t_relay() not relaying payload

We currently have opensips setup to route through another carrier for certain calls. All signaling and media works well except for reinvites. if (has_totag()) { # sequential request within a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing

[OpenSIPS-Users] carrierroute rule_fixup log entry

Hello All, Quick question on a log file entry with regards to carrierroute 1.4.5-notls. opensips[32717]: INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup: fixing tree 0 opensips[32717]: INFO:carrierroute:rule_fixup_recursor: hashless rule with host x.x.x.x hash hash_index 1 The second line repeats for entry in the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Problem with miss call logging in radius (radacct) database

Hi, El 29/01/10 16:28, ASHWINI NAIDU escribió: Hi all, I have upgraded my CDRTool-6.9.x to CDRTool-7.0.0 . I could see the cdrs of miss calls when i was using the CDRTool-6.9.x but after upgrading i do not see the missed call logs for CDRTool-7.0.0 nor in the radacct table. I have

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] lookup b flag - one registration at a time

Bogdan, Over the last day or so I've noticed some other weirdness too, particularly with engage_media_proxy() not working reliably. I'm thinking I might have pieces-parts of different builds laying around. I'm not always the best at removing /usr/local/lib/opensips before I install a new

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Users Digest, Vol 18, Issue 97

Hi Anca, Thanks for your reply. I was checking the module documentation of 1.6 version for b2b_logic where both the parameters custom_headers as well as cleanup_period is documented. Later I realized that it points to the devel folder. I will check with the devel version anyways. But just for my