[OpenSIPS-Users] [IMPORTANT] Release policy - changes

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, Following the start of the work for OpenSIPS 2.0, the priorities and policies on releases changed. Right now, most of development effort will be invested in the version 2.0 code. What this means: A) Old (existing) design - there will be no more major release for this design - that's it,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] B2BUA help

2010-02-16 Thread opensipslist
Hello Anca, An ven., févr 12, 2010, opensipsl...@encambio.com schrieb: >An ven., févr 12, 2010, Anca Vamanu schrieb: >>It is ok to have cseq 2 on the other side if the received Invite >>has cseq 1. The implementation uses cseq +1 on the other side :). >>It should not be an issue. >> >You're right

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Aliases to multiple users

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Daniel, actually the alias_db module (as C code) supports multiple users with the same alias. see: http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.6.x/alias_db.html#id228163 So, if you remove the DB constraint, it should work. Regards, Bogdan Daniel Goepp wrote: > Thanks, it helps...not

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] How to get dialed number after call start?

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Alexander, To read digits after the call started, you need an IVR (media server) - OpenSIPS cannot do something like that as it has no media support. As I remember, Asterisk has a Read function for that - http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+Read Regards, Bogdan Кузьмицкий Алекс

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Contact list in REGISTER response

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, Yes, that is the only way - if REGISTRAR module builds the reply, it will do it in RFC way (adding all the registered contacts) and you cannot change this behaviour. Regards, Bogdan mayamatakeshi wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:54 AM, mayamatakeshi > mailto:mayamatake...@gmail.com>>

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] registrar save "f" flag missing in current builds

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi Jeff, Now, according to the new release policy, the backport of this change from trunk to 1.6 is doable :) I will take care or it Regards, Bogdan Jeff Pyle wrote: > Ha! I crack myself up. May I request this? > > > - Jeff > > > On Feb 15, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > >

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Via with "received=YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY"

2010-02-16 Thread Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Hi, The received param is automatically added by OpenSIPS (as per RFC) as it detects a difference between the IP address in the VIA hdr (the UAC's IP) and the source IP at network level (the LB's IP). There is no way to disable this (as it is standard SIP processing), but if something really

[OpenSIPS-Users] Aliases to multiple users

2010-02-16 Thread Кузьмицкий Александр
Can you show litle example about using branches in this case? I want to all calls(branches) starts dialing in parallel mode/ ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Via with "received=YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY"

2010-02-16 Thread Pauba, Kevin L
Thanks for the offer, Bogdan. I've patched it up myself just to see that it works as expected. In msg_translator.c:received_builder() I added the #ifdef ... #else ... #endif: #ifdef NOTDEFINED memcpy(buf, RECEIVED, RECEIVED_LEN); if ( (tmp=ip_addr2a(source_ip))==0)

[OpenSIPS-Users] restore_uri error

2010-02-16 Thread Jeff Pyle
Hello, I make use of uac_replace_from() in my scripts. I believe that is where this error message is coming from: ERROR:uac:restore_uri: new URI shorter than old URI Can anyone explain what this really means? Having a new URI shorter than an old one really doesn't seem like an error conditi

[OpenSIPS-Users] Aliases to multiple users

2010-02-16 Thread Кузьмицкий Александр
I`m trying next routing logic: for alias 1009 i have two subscribers 1000 and 1001 When I try dialing from 1002 to 1009 ring only one phone(first element from table dbalias). Config blocks: .. modparam("alias_db", "append_branches", 1) .. alias_db_lookup("dbaliases");