On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Brett Nemeroff wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> wrote:
>>
>> That said, I'd go for Git, but having a svn mirror would also be nice so
>> that people can still fetch the source the 'old skool' way.
>>
>
> This cracks me up.. when did S
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
wrote:
> That said, I'd go for Git, but having a svn mirror would also be nice so
> that people can still fetch the source the 'old skool' way.
>
>
This cracks me up.. when did SVN become "old skool"? Where have I been?
I hear good things about
Sorry, my message seems to be cut by mailman (according to the
sourceforge archive) - resending full version:
I'd go with - "please no SVN" ;) (or at least keep an official mirror
in another repo type)
Why?
- We're keeping a number of patches that are company-specific, so will
never go into Opens
Hi,
El 02/03/10 19:18, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a proto
> core including config, transport, threading, reactor and dispatcher), we
> will upload the code the public SF repo.
>
> I would like to get some feedba
I'm certainly open to trying new things. But without looking into the
complexities of the newer systems, I know that they can get very complicated
very quickly. I do like, however, integrated code hosting, like you
suggested. But I know similar options are available with SVN.
Personally, I don't c
Thanks I'll try that
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Zahid Mehmood
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 2:25 PM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Error starting opensips after upgrade
Steve,
alter db table "pua" to add a new column "to_uri". That should do it. I
don't think it is documented yet.
--
Zahid
On Mar 2, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Steven C. Blair wrote:
After upgrading to the svn head release I get the following error when starting
opensips with my previously workin
Brett,
From a user perspective then its not so difficult to learn a few extra
commands.
Most users I would imagine want to download the code and compile.
Although, I agree that SVN is by far more adopted.
I think going forward, companies like GitHub and BitBucket offer great
code hosting opti
Bogdan,
I personally really like SVN. It's widely accepted and well documented. I'm
sure that some newer code repo systems offer some really nice features, but
I'm curious what percent of the community has used newer repo types and
would be comfortable using them to their full potential (properly!)
You can offer both GIT and SVN with git-svn [1]. I think that git it's
very more powerful and comfortable to use than subversion.
[1] http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-svn.html
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://l
On 02.03.2010 18:18, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> SF offers the following options
> - SVN
> - git
> - mercurial
> - bazaar
>
> Should we keep SVN ? pros ? minuses ? something much better ?
I'd go with - "please no SVN" ;) (or at least keep an official mirror in
another repo type)
I have found that the speed of mercurial seems to be an issue with
larger sized project.
For example, try downloading adium: hg clone http://hg.adium.im/adium
My vote is for git.
Regards,
Norm
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> As we are getting closed to first working code for Open
After upgrading to the svn head release I get the following error when starting
opensips with my previously working config file. I don't see any mention of a
database table update being required as part of update. Could someone explain
this error?
Thanks,Steve
INFO: Starting OpenSIPS :
ERROR
Hi everyone,
As we are getting closed to first working code for OpenSIPS 2.0 (a proto
core including config, transport, threading, reactor and dispatcher), we
will upload the code the public SF repo.
I would like to get some feedback from you about what repo type to use -
as we have the opport
Hello list,
I am trying to implement presence with opensips 1.6.0-notls and
linksys spa942 firmware 6.1.5(a). On the phone side, I have configured
an idle line with blf (fnc=blf;sub=2...@$proxy;nme=2036)
On server side, I am using the presence_dialoginfo.so and
pua_dialoginfo.so modules as
Adding skip_modules="aaa_radius db_oracle" fixes the build problem
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Steven C. Blair
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:33 AM
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] making svn trunk vers
I'm trying to build OpenSIPS from the latest svn trunk in order to test changes
made to BLA however I keep encountering a series of errors. I'm hoping someone
can explain the build process as I have not seen these errors before.
Aaa_radius is included in the exclude modules list however I need
Probably not too much, but it really depends on what modules you are using
and how you are using them
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:22 AM, Brian Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> Is there much involved in moving a Kamailio 1.5.3 install to the current
> version of OpenSIPS ?
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
> ___
Hello Brian,
I'm running OpenSIPS as opensips:opensips.
Although I checked that /tmp/ has chmod 777, I created the opensips
user as a system user so it might be more restricted.
Maybe that is the problem? I don't mind running OpenSIPS as root, as
it will be the only service running on my box (it
Hi List,
Is there much involved in moving a Kamailio 1.5.3 install to the current
version of OpenSIPS ?
Thanks,
Brian
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi Alex,
What user are you running openSips as ? Sounds like permissions problem.
Regards,
Brian
On 1 Mar 2010, at 19:42, Alejandro Recarey wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I have just made a fresh install of OpenSIPS 1.6.1 using the
> http://debian.leurent.eu/ mirror.
>
> I am using debian lenn
21 matches
Mail list logo
