Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registrant module invite auth

2011-06-20 Thread Razvan Crainea
Hi Chris, Please make sure that on your reply route x you call rtpproxy_answer() method. Regards, Razvan Crainea OpenSIPS Developer On 17.06.2011 20:18, Chris Martineau wrote: Hi, On further investigation it would seem that the 183 and 200oks are not being updated by rtpproxy with the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Dialog Ping

2011-06-20 Thread Vlad Paiu
Hello Brett, You are right, this was a bug, and I just commited a fix on trunk. Until now, the reply handler only considered internal OpenSIPS timeouts, and disregarded explicit 408 replies. Please update and let me know if it is ok. Regards, -- Vlad Paiu OpenSIPS Developer On

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Weird memory problems

2011-06-20 Thread Vlad Paiu
Hello, This is really bad, seems like a memory corruption problem. It would be a great deal of help if you would follow the steps here [1] and reply when the problem reappears. Regards, -- Vlad Paiu OpenSIPS Developer [1] http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsTsMem On 06/17/2011 09:36

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registrant module invite auth

2011-06-20 Thread Chris Martineau
Hi, This all works fine when not using the invite auth with everything routing through the correct reply route for 183/200 responses (which contain the correct rtpproxy_answer setups). Regards Chris -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registrant module invite auth

2011-06-20 Thread Razvan Crainea
Hi Chris, You will only need to call rtpproxy_offer() for the authenticated INVITE and register the onreply route that calls rtpproxy_answer() only for these INVITEs. Regards, Razvan Crainea OpenSIPS Developer On 20.06.2011 12:04, Chris Martineau wrote: Hi, This all works fine when not

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Registrant module invite auth

2011-06-20 Thread Chris Martineau
Hi, Figured it out, the order in the failure route was calling unforce_rtpproxy before the 407 check. Thanks for your help. Regards Chris -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Razvan Crainea Sent: 20 June 2011

[OpenSIPS-Users] 30x redirect for register

2011-06-20 Thread Dani Popa
Hi all, It is viable solution to use 30(1|2|5) redirect for REGISTER sip messages ? Thanks, Dani ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Presentity basicclosed/basic always Closed

2011-06-20 Thread Anca Vamanu
Hi Duane, Sure looks like a Bria problem.. If it sends publishes with status closed, the presence server doesn't have what else to do but to believe that is the real state that it wants to publish. Maybe something in Bria's configuration leads to this... Regards, Anca Vamanu On Mon, Jun 20,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Presentity basicclosed/basic always Closed

2011-06-20 Thread Duane Larson
Anca, Doing some more testing it looks like the Bria client is sending PUBLISH messages and they are open. Only when they bria client is shut down is the record in the presentity table set to closed. Then when the Bria client is turned on again a new PUBLISH is sent and entered into the

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Presentity basicclosed/basic always Closed

2011-06-20 Thread duane . larson
Anca, Please ignore. This is a Bria issue it appears. It is true that initially when you first log in with a Bria client it sends a Publish message and has statusbasicclosed/basic/status in the message. I was doing an NGREP and after that message is received if you wait a little while