Thats perfect :)
So do brief others about what things to specially care for while setting
this type of server/network.
Like you got help from users, some users will get help from your reply too.
Thanks,
Sammy
On Sep 11, 2012 8:25 AM, "Nick Chang" wrote:
> Hello Sammy
>
> ** **
>
> I found t
Hello Sammy
I found this problem, firewall.
Now, My firewall is vigor 2930. It's not good. So It have a lot of problem.
I changed to Cisco ASA. It's solved.
Thanks for your support.
Thanks
Nick
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.open
Sometimes no audio!! What about rest of the times ?
On Sep 11, 2012 7:54 AM, "Nick Chang" wrote:
> Hello Sammy
>
> ** **
>
> No, I don’t forget.
>
> ** **
>
> My rtpproxy’s startup script is “/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
> 111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 3601
Hello Sammy
No, I don't forget.
My rtpproxy's startup script is "/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -l
111.22.33.44/10.1.2.103 -s udp:10.1.2.103 1 -F -m 36000 -M 36010 -d
DBUG"
I have forwarded the 36000~36010 port to rtpproxy server.
Firewall --- Opensips/rtpproxy Serv
Hi Nick,
So you've forwarded the 5060 port to opensips server, cool. Did you forget
to mention about the RTP ports forwarded to server ?
Start RTPproxy with param -m and -M to assign range of RTP ports to use.
Then forward that UDP port range to opensips server too.
Then see what happens with audio
Hello Sammy
My NAT type is Full cone NAT.
In Firewall, I setting a IP & port 5060 to LAN IP.
Example:
Firewall --- Opensips Server
111.22.33.44:5060 10.1.2.103:5050
Thanks
Nick
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users
Hi Binan,
I tried upgrading to 1.8.1 but I'm having some issues I'm duscussin with
Bogdan on the following thread:
http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2012-August/022764.html
Thanks
Diego
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Binan AL Halabi wrote:
> hi Diego,
>
> 1- As you dont have state in
hi Diego,
1- As you dont have state in database so you dont need to check that.
2- Why you dont upgrade to opensips 1.8.1 ? since it contains TCP fix.
Regards.
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Binan AL Halabi wrote:
From: Binan AL Halabi
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't se
If you have
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio wrote:
From: Diego Barberio
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send an OK response
under high load
To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list"
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 10:51 AM
Hi Binan,
I understand what do you say with
Thanks!
It's working.
2012/9/10 Muhammad Shahzad
> Set following modparam, and all AVPs will be visible in reply route as
> well,
>
> modparam("tm", "onreply_avp_mode", 1)
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I need to change acc
Hi Binan,
I understand what do you say with "play around TCP connection lifetime"
however I don't get the part you say "check the database". I don't have any
database, opensips is working without any DB.
Which database are you talking about?
Thanks
Diego
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Binan AL
Hi Diego,
play around TCP connection lifetime, you could find something.
one thing more check the database during the busy hour and see if something
expired.
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Diego Barberio wrote:
From: Diego Barberio
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] FW: Opensips 1.6.4 doesn't send
No, it doesn't accept Route header.
--
Nick
2012/9/10 Jorge Henrique Pinho :
> Hi,
>
> Can anyone clarify if the back to back logic module allows (or is
> configurable to allow) initial requests to be routed base on the Route
> header? From the tests I ran I see that it always forwards the requ
Hi,
Can anyone clarify if the back to back logic module allows (or is configurable
to allow) initial requests to be routed base on the Route header? From the
tests I ran I see that it always forwards the request based on the RURI.
Kind Regards,
Jorge Pinho
Analyst/Developer
Network Platform
Set following modparam, and all AVPs will be visible in reply route as well,
modparam("tm", "onreply_avp_mode", 1)
Thank you.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dragomir Haralambiev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to change accounted AVPs values on onreply_route.
> How to do that?
> Here is example:
Hi All,
I'm still having this issue. However, I went on with my investigation and
I've discovered that this issue only happens with my SIP over TCP
connections (I have 10 TCP connections)
I've upgraded to version:
Server:: OpenSIPS (1.7.2-notls (i386/linux))
And the issue is still there.
Do you
Hello,
I need to change accounted AVPs values on onreply_route.
How to do that?
Here is example:
modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_level", 1)
modparam("acc", "cdr_flag", 2)
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "log_
Hi,
Nick what is your NAT type? how is your network topology working !!
BR
Sammy
P.S: The blog only takes care of configurations of RTPproxy with servers on
Public IPs and clients behind NAT using Kamailio - This won't make much
sense here. Also alot of things have evolved in kamailio since I wr
Hi Nick,
see this link posted by Qasim,
http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/03/making-rtpproxy-work.html
I like it really, you can read it and adjust it as u need,
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang wrote:
From: Nick Chang
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS us
Dear Binan
Yes, It’s my setting.
route[nat_fixups] {
# RTP Proxy handling ---#
if (is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) {
unforce_rtp_proxy();
} else if (is_method("INVITE")){
# Activates the RTP Proxy for the CALLEE ---#
Hi Nick,
and you are setting rtpproxy_offer() for Invite right !
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang wrote:
From: Nick Chang
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'"
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 2:02 AM
Hi Binan But, My problem still
Hi Binan
But, My problem still it.
It’s not work for this setting.
Or Do you have any suggest?
Thanks
Nick
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Binan AL Halabi
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:57 PM
To: OpenSIPS use
Hi Nick,
thank you too,
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang wrote:
From: Nick Chang
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'"
Date: Monday, September 10, 2012, 1:46 AM
Hello Binan force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old funct
Hello Binan
force_rtp_proxy do not support opensips 1.8.1. It is old function.
You can saw this page http://www.opensips.org/Resources/DocsMigration163to164
Now, I setting “rtpproxy_answer("cowf","202.55.233.194")”
Thanks
Nick
From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org
[mailto:use
Hi Nick,
use force_rtp_proxy
here is the link:
http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/1.4.x/nathelper.html#id271191
//Binan
--- On Mon, 9/10/12, Nick Chang wrote:
From: Nick Chang
Subject: [OpenSIPS-Users] RTPPRoxy behind NAT
To: "'OpenSIPS users mailling list'"
Date: Monday, September
Hello
My RTPPRoxy and Opensips installed on the same server.
Then It behind a NAT.
It's my log. How to change "c=IN IP4 10.1.1.51" to "c=IN IP4 public IP"
U 2012/09/10 15:57:22.704873 10.1.2.103:5060 -> 111.81.182.252:2151
INVITE sip:0939723377@111.81.182.252:2151;line=d210bc79dfd2c52
Hello!
Is it possible to use topology_hiding() from dialog module with MESSAGE?
I receive ERROR:dialog:w_topology_hiding: Failed to create dialog.
--
Nick
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
27 matches
Mail list logo
