Hi Bogdan,
Thank you for the reply.
On 21 October 2012 07:16, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
> **
> Hi David,
>
> There were several fixes, mainly related to error handling. Now,
> considering that the DB connections are shared between modules (inside the
> same process), maybe the faulty module w
I have a problem with a very simple OpenSIPS doing B2BUA topology
hiding that is unable to handle incoming UPDATEs from the server-side.
The proxy does not tie the UPDATE to the in-progress dialog, and so it
warns with a "No dialog found" error.
I was able to locate a post from earlier this year (
Hey folks,
Just wanted to say thanks and provide an update in case others have this
issue.
The problem was essentially that the ip address was in the domain table. I
removed it from the domain table, adding it as an alias in the cfg and
added an additional uri==myself when determining if an inco
In "modules/tm/timer.c" function "final_response_handler", a #define is used
to set the Reason header in the CANCEL when triggered by the invite timeout.
The default is cause=480;text="NO_ANSWER", but I think it should be 408
because 408 is timeout and 480 is temporarily unavailable.
I need to be
Thanks Bogdan for taking time to respond to my post. I think you have
guessed it right, I am using the sample routing script given in the Load
Balancer (LB) tutorial and that is most likely sending the ACK and BYE
messages directly to Client 2 bypassing the Proxy. The routing code
snippets I am usi
Dear list
We develop SIP clients and have an OpenSIPS 1.8.0 test server. We are bound
to use TCP and frequently kill the clients without unregistering. This
leads to invalid contacts in the location table.
It often takes a long time for an INVITE or MESSAGE to be forwarded by the
server. In syslo
Hi ,
i don't know how to realize this:
A --- INVITE>proxy INVITE> B
<--- 200 OK
---BYE>
---INVITE ->C
<--- 200 OK p
