Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS on ESX

2014-01-06 Thread Rik Broers
Yes, And no issues regarding virtualization have come up. Opensips is very happy on a low memory VM. It shares a host with around 60 other machines. From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Hiers, David Sent: dinsdag 7 januari 2014 00:30 To

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS on ESX

2014-01-06 Thread Rudy Pedraza
David, Yes -- Thank you for choosing Dynamic Packet. Rudy Dynamic Packet Corp Toll-Free: 888-929-VOIP (8647) Office: 302-448- Fax: 302-448-2223 - Original Message - From: "David Hiers" To: "OpenSIPS users mailling list" Sent: Monday, January 6, 2014 6:29:54 PM Subject:

[OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS on ESX

2014-01-06 Thread Hiers, David
Hi, Is anyone running OpenSIPS in a virtualized ESX environment in production? Thanks, David This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended reci

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] No record-route on reply's

2014-01-06 Thread Mike Tesliuk
i put some more information on syslog, this is what happens when i receive the bye the _EXTERNAL_IP_FS_ is the return of the $si variable , so i have the $fu and $ru the gateway have the ip *10.255.2.21 port 5021 , and openspis have the ip 10.1.69.1:5079 * Jan 6 20:15:28

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] No record-route on reply's

2014-01-06 Thread Mike Tesliuk
Ok, the dialog are ok using topology_hiding The only problem that i see now is with the bye. This is what i have on my syslog Jan 6 17:39:29 gcl-ss01a /usr/sbin/opensips[29909]: Initial Invite sip:200214@PUBLIC_IP sip:255755813256@10.1.69.1:5079 [ INVITE ] Jan 6 17:39:29 gcl-ss01a /usr/sbin/op

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] No record-route on reply's

2014-01-06 Thread Mike Tesliuk
ok, i try to use this and i got diferent results now topology_hiding("U"); i didnt see the dialog errors anymore , i got a problem with the bye now but i will made some changes on the network to check about this. i will post the result later 2014/1/6 Mike Tesliuk > As i re

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS/RTpProxy BridgeMode after failure route

2014-01-06 Thread Salman Zafar
Hi Razvan, I got it working without branching, after banging head a lot I got to learn unforcing drops the media ports for previous rtpproxy offer/answer and after that directing the new flow though rtpproxy flags,IP media works. I am able to traverse from eternal to internal play media and

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] No record-route on reply's

2014-01-06 Thread Mike Tesliuk
As i receive the 200 ok without the Record-Route by the gateway, is it possible to the gateway stablish the signalling directly with the user and in this case i didnt receive the bye ? i think that is what happen with this gateway 2014/1/5 Mike Tesliuk > Hello Razvan (and everybody), > > I try

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] OpenSIPS/RTpProxy BridgeMode after failure route

2014-01-06 Thread Răzvan Crainea
Hi, Salman! The sockets used by RTPProxy are created when the session is started (the first offer) and cannot be updated afterwards. Therefore the only solution I can see is to configure a per branch scenario, as you mentioned. Best regards, Razvan Crainea OpenSIPS Core Developer http://www.