Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] STUN

2014-03-04 Thread Liviu Chircu
Hello Nick, Thank you for the feedback! Now I have to start updating the documentation... :( Best regards, Liviu Chircu OpenSIPS Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 03/04/2014 07:08 AM, Nick Altmann wrote: Hello, Liviu. It seems it works well. Thank you. Let's add it to source

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Renegotiation

2014-03-04 Thread Jorge Ortea
Hi all, Anyone know how to do this? Thanks. Regards. From: dar...@hotmail.com To: stefano.pis...@omnianet.it; users@lists.opensips.org Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:12:16 +0100 Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Renegotiation Hi Stefano, How I can do that? Very thanks. Regards. Date: Thu, 27

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Timer shift on dr-pinger

2014-03-04 Thread Vlad Paiu
Hello, First of all, what kind of probing mode do you have defined ? ( [1] ) Possible reasons are that either you are talking to your gateways via TCP, and OpenSIPS is losing some time establishing new connections or actually sending out SIP messages via TCP. You can set some thresholds

[OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread ag
Hello, There is a new release of MediaProxy with new features and support for Amazon EC2 like environments (1 to 1 NAT): Changelog mediaproxy (2.6.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium * Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges * Added ability to configure the advertised

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Nick Cameo
* Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges * Added ability to configure the advertised IP address Before I get excited here. We now have the ability to run within NAT (ie, the way RTPProxy does with private network)? If so, I will do 120 jumping jacks right now

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
On Mar 4, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Nick Cameo wrote: * Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges * Added ability to configure the advertised IP address Before I get excited here. We now have the ability to run within NAT (ie, the way RTPProxy does with private

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Salman Zafar
Great, well the first question came into my mind is what Nick has already asked. Is it so?. On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Nick Cameo sym...@gmail.com wrote: * Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges * Added ability to configure the advertised IP address

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Nikita Tarasov
I will very appreciate RTP recording for next feature On 04 Mar 2014, at 18:37, a...@ag-projects.com wrote: Hello, There is a new release of MediaProxy with new features and support for Amazon EC2 like environments (1 to 1 NAT): Changelog mediaproxy (2.6.0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Jeff Pyle
* Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges Does this mean it will pass traffic between a public interface and a private interface, effectively bridging RTP between the two different networks? This is very similar to rtpproxy's bridging feature, something I'd love to

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
On Mar 4, 2014, at 4:15 PM, Jeff Pyle wrote: * Added ability to relay traffic to selected routable private ranges Does this mean it will pass traffic between a public interface and a private interface, effectively bridging RTP between the two different networks? This is very similar

[OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-04 Thread ag
http://mediaproxy.ag-projects.com/projects/mediaproxy/wiki/Scalability Adrian signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] MediaProxy scalability FAQ updated

2014-03-04 Thread david
Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous call, regardless of the hardware resources available providing no other program competes with the same resources on that machine. Bigger scalability can be achieved by adding more hardware. ??? Mediaproxy can handle at least one simultaneous

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Nick Cameo
TLDR: yes, that should work. Should I stop doing jumping jacks? Saul being the idiot savant that I am when it comes to grey areas. Let's just assume for one sec that the IP address where I have OpenSIPS + MediaProxy installed is 192.168.2.76 (No, not IANA public IP), my own private IP. And

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
Hi, On Mar 4, 2014, at 5:44 PM, Nick Cameo wrote: TLDR: yes, that should work. Should I stop doing jumping jacks? Saul being the idiot savant that I am when it comes to grey areas. Let's just assume for one sec that the IP address where I have OpenSIPS + MediaProxy installed is

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] New MediaProxy release 2.6.0

2014-03-04 Thread Nick Cameo
Hello Saul, I was looking at a SIP trace on an active call as I type this. Actually we only need the public ip address advertised in the SDP payload for the device which is behind NAT (ie, listening on a private ip address with 1to1 port forwarded mapping done on the router for the public ip