Hi, Gary!
The configuration file looks ok. Can you check if the /var/log/acc
directory exists? Do you see any errors in the logs?
Best regards,
Razvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Core Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 03/05/2014 11:40 PM, Gary Nyquist wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to configure
Hi Bogdan,
Can you give us some example?
I use opensips with rtpproxy. but when I use the topology_hiding(), dialogs not
matched and OK with SDP not received to the call party and media path not
established.
Thanks so.
Best Regards,
H.Yavari
From: Bogdan-Andr
Hello Denis,
Thanks for the feedback, I will look into it
and come back to you.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 06.03.2014 0
Hi,
This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS is
high? What about RTPproxy?
For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what solution is best for
media handling?
Best Regards,
H.Yavari
Wait wait wait
Can you pleas
You would need a much better sense of humour to be able to scale up :-)
Adrian
On 06 Mar 2014, at 08:50, H Yavari wrote:
> Hi,
> This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS
> is high? What about RTPproxy?
> For using the maximum capacity of OpenSIPS(250k), what
So what is this means Adrian???
You would need a much better sense of humour to be able to scale up :-)
Adrian
On 06 Mar 2014, at 08:50, H Yavari wrote:
Hi,
>This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that CPS is
>high? What about
Hi, H.Yavari
To begin with, if you can - share your config please.
And, if not difficult - setting rtpproxy.
that was where to start ...
Thanks so.
06.03.2014 13:49, H Yavari writes:
Thanks so.
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http:/
Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced even till today that it can handle at
least one call! Still waiting!
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari wrote:
> Hi,
> This means that we can't use mediaproxy for high load environments that
> CPS is high? What about RTPproxy?
> For using the maximum cap
Hello Tony,
You may consider this a side effect of how the OpenSIPS B2BUA works. As
we want to be transparent from media point of view, OpenSIPS does not
get involved into SDP negotiation -> it is transparent, passing the SDPs
between the end points. This is mainly based on the late-SDP negoti
Thanks for explaining this, Bogdan.
I'm curious, though - would things work better if the late-SDP
negotiation were done the other way around i.e., since call3 is a new
call it could take longer for setup to occur, and during this time call1
times out. If we were to send the initial INVITE to ca
Please clarify "handle at least one call" ? what is this means?
Well, RTPproxy doesn't announced even till today that it can handle at least
one call! Still waiting!
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:50 PM, H Yavari wrote:
Hi,
>This means that we can't use med
Hi H.
The FAQ is suppose to be humorous as there is no good absolute answer for what
is the exact scalability of MediaProxy.
If it is not fun to you please accept my apologies, it is not meant to offend
anybody.
Adrian
On 06 Mar 2014, at 17:34, H Yavari wrote:
> Please clarify "handle at le
H,
I'm sure the FAQ was a joke.. The reason for all the joking around is that
there is no way to answer this question. It's the reason for the ridiculous
answer to begin with.
In old-school hardware based telephony, you had these expensive DSPs. Each
DSP gave you a specific number of channels that
Hi, H.Yavari.
Please give an example of its connection diagrams: UAC-OPENSIPS-MGW...
Show which modules and options you ordered in.cfg?
In your example: "rtpproxy_offer (" ro ");" - that is "ro"?
And as a part of the code:
if ( src_ip==XXY ) {
route(5);
exit;
14 matches
Mail list logo
