Hi,
last time radius server was not sending back requests, so opensips was
waiting and waiting and voip was not working.
Today our enum server broke and opensips was agin waiting and waiting
for responses and our voip did not work for the time that enum server
was down.
Is it possible to d
Hi:
I execute that patch .
the sipp beging run at Oct 13 19:07:01
The following is a log fragment.
Oct 13 19:07:01 localhost /usr/sbin/opensips[24352]:
ERROR:mi_fifo:mi_fifo_reply: fifo_error: write error: Broken pipe
Oct 13 19:27:01 localhost /usr/sbin/opensips[24352]:
ERROR:m
Hi Bogdan,
Thanks for the response. I have edited the script as you have mentioned but I
have the same problem:
401 message going to .3 is not passed by .141(opensips lb)
else if (is_method("REGISTER")) {
xlog("xlog_initialregister");
if($si=="192.168.2
Hi Bogdan,
I am using following lines (just sharing related part of the script) to check
first if the method is REGISTER and sending to .3 (open ims node 1) and .5(open
ims node 2) if it is coming from .11(ims bench traffic generator).
Otherwise I am sending directly to the set destination.
Hi Kaan,
That is completely wrong as you break the transaction logic. The correct
way of doing parallel forking is :
if($si=="192.168.2.11") {
$du = "sip:192.168.2.3:4060";
append_branch(); # add first destination with the above value
$du = "sip:192.168.2.5:4060";
t_relay();
Hi Bogdan,
I am using following lines (just sharing related part of the script) to check
first if the method is REGISTER and sending to .3 (open ims node 1) and .5(open
ims node 2) if it is coming from .11(ims bench traffic generator).
Otherwise I am sending directly to the set destination.
Thank you Bogdan,
Setting $rd did the job.
Regards,
2014-10-13 10:25 GMT+03:00 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu :
> Hello Volkan,
>
> The drouting module sets the GW directly into RURI, so you can get its IP
> from $rd.
> The dispatcher module, depending on the function you use ( xx_dst() or
> xxx_domain()
Hi Kaan,
In OpenSIPS, how do you script to have the REGISTER sent to both .3 and .5 ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 13.10.2014 13:11, Kaan Dandin wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
Following 401 messages are coming from .3 , but not passed to
Hi Bogdan,
Following 401 messages are coming from .3 , but not passed to .11
by opensips (.141)
Kind regards,
Kaan
63 1.233561192.168.2.3 192.168.2.141 SIP Status: 401
Unauthorized - Challenging the UE (0 bindings)
64 1.241624192.168.2.3 192.168.2
Hello Alec,
Could you paste the 200 reply that is causing the error? I suspect there
is something wrong with the "To" header.
Best regards,
Liviu Chircu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 10/07/2014 03:24 AM, Alec Doran-Twyford wrote:
Hi all,
I am getting this error "E
Well, may be he Opensips endpoint? And generate ISUP messages messages?
13.10.2014 11:12, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu пишет:
SIP-I and SIP-T are extensions of SIP - and they are transparent for a
SIP proxy. So OpenSIPS can route SIP-I and SIP-T. What is important is
to have end-points which do understa
Please apply this patch:
https://gist.github.com/bogdan-iancu/851b092a1f457a19a463
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 13.10.2014 10:35, zhouxiaoqiang.mst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Bogdan:
I am glad to do that.
please, give
Hi Bogdan:
I am glad to do that.
please, give me your patch.
zhouxiaoqiang.mst...@gmail.com
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
Date: 2014-10-13 15:27
To: OpenSIPS users mailling list; zhouxiaoqiang.mstech
Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] branch computation failed
Hi,
That is really strange - I
Hi,
That is really strange - If I prepare a small patch to print some logs
to understand why the t_calc_branch() fails, it ok with you to give it a
try ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 10.10.2014 05:08, chow wrote:
Hi Bogdan
Hello Volkan,
The drouting module sets the GW directly into RURI, so you can get its
IP from $rd.
The dispatcher module, depending on the function you use ( xx_dst() or
xxx_domain() ) the GW may be set either in $dd, either in $rd.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
Hi George,
If you see private IPs in the VIA or Contact hdrs of the requests coming
from your UAC, it means STUN was not used.
You can run an ngrep on your opensips server on the IPs and ports used
by STUN, to see if you receive anything from that UAC.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS
Hi,
SIP-I and SIP-T are extensions of SIP - and they are transparent for a
SIP proxy. So OpenSIPS can route SIP-I and SIP-T. What is important is
to have end-points which do understand these extensions.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions
Hi Kaan,
OK, you fork to .3 and .5 and I see only .5 answering - nothing back
from .3 . So OpenSIPS sends back to IMS .11 the reply from .5, the 401.
Where is the problem?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 10.10.2014 23:48, Kaan
18 matches
Mail list logo
