Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Opensips-CP

2015-03-13 Thread Terrance Devor
Bogdan/OpenSIPS team, What is the take on this. Can other users approach such offers or does the OpenSIPS team take presidency? Either way it's ok, and thought it was a good idea to ask before approaching John. Terrance ​ ___ Users mailing list Users@li

[OpenSIPS-Users] 500 Server error in REGISTER message

2015-03-13 Thread Satish Patel
Hello, Why we are getting 500 error in REGISTER time? Even i got register successfully, is it normal? 01:26:01.078025 │ REGISTER │ │ │ ──> │ │ 01:26:01.078032 │ REGISTER │ │ │

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 500 Server error in REGISTER message

2015-03-13 Thread Babil Golam Sarwar
Hi Satish, you should check the server logs. This could be caused by memory allocation failure, low memory and/or high CPU activity experienced by OpenSIPS on the server side. You can enable console debugging by adding the following to `opensips.cfg': debug=4 fork=no log_stderror=yes After that,

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 500 Server error in REGISTER message

2015-03-13 Thread Satish Patel
Thanks for reply, I am not seeing any memory error in logs, This is testing box, so there is no load on CPU, I am registering single client. I am using multi-domain with mysql DB. This is what in debug i am seeing DBG:auth:check_response: authorization is OK ... DBG:core:mk_proxy: doing DNS look

[OpenSIPS-Users] indeterminate is_present_hf behavior

2015-03-13 Thread Eric Werkhoven
Hi, I've experienced some puzzling behavior with the is_present_hf function of the sipmsgops module, version 1.11. When checking for the presence of a custom header the function sometimes returns true and sometimes false for the same header in the same INVITE message. Here is the relevant code

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Announcing rtpproxy v2.0.0

2015-03-13 Thread John Mathew
RFC3095 would be great. On Saturday, 14 March 2015, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Do you have any particular RFC in mind? > On Mar 12, 2015 10:28 AM, "John Mathew" > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Maxim, >> Is there any plans for rtp header compression in future. I can't see >> anything in the change log for 2